2008 the Third International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology (Iccgi 2008) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/iccgi.2008.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MECRAD: Model and Tool for the Technical Quality Evaluation of Software Products in Visual Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When evaluating projects or products participating in creativity, innovation and invention contests, the application of a metric plan within the framework of a methodology or model is required [13]. That is why we select MECHDAV-MECRAD [14]. Further, we select the PROYEVA [21], [22], [24] model to apply a metrics program.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When evaluating projects or products participating in creativity, innovation and invention contests, the application of a metric plan within the framework of a methodology or model is required [13]. That is why we select MECHDAV-MECRAD [14]. Further, we select the PROYEVA [21], [22], [24] model to apply a metrics program.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model introduced is based on international standards IEEE610 [1], IEEE1061 [2], ISO / IEC 9126 [3], ISO / IEC 14598 [4], Project SQUARE (ISO 25000) [5], SUMI [6] and others, as well as in other Mexican models (MECHDAV-MECRAD [14], [17], [18], [20]), [21]), PROYEVA-PROJEVA [15], [19], [22], [24] ORMEX [25], [26], [27]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows that the empirical model is mostly used in measuring the software quality (67%). The method includes survey [26], [48], [49], [59], [63], observation [21], [27], [31][32][33], [35], [37], [39], [42][43][44], [52], [53], [64] and usability testing [23], [65] involving the assessment of users. This achievement is followed by the analytical method at 17% (includes heuristics evaluation [34], [40], exploratory case study [50], and evaluation group [30], [45]).…”
Section: Screening Of Papers and Keywording Of Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%