2004
DOI: 10.4102/koers.v69i2.303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

'Medelyemoegheid' – die hantering van sekondêre traumatiese stres

Abstract: 'Compassion fatigue' – coping with secondary traumatic stress

There is a cost to caring. Professionals who listen to clients’ stories of fear, pain and suffering may feel similar fear, pain and suffering because they care. Simply the knowledge that a loved one has been exposed to a traumatic event can be traumatising – in this respect trauma can sometimes be contagious. The consequence of this process is that trauma therapy profoundly changes the therapist. These changes are both i…
Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that only dictionary definitions were included in the concept analysis process, while all the other literature sources were used only to confirm the findings of the study, might be seen as a limitation of the study. The rationale for this was that compassion fatigue was most frequently defined by using the definitions of secondary traumatic stress (Sexton, 1999; Baird & Jenkins, 2003; Huggard, 2003; Coetzer, 2004; Maytum et al ., 2004; Kraus, 2005; Abendroth & Flannery, 2006; Adams et al ., 2006; Conrad & Kellar‐Guenther, 2006; Sabo, 2006; Van den Berg et al ., 2006; White, 2006), which is not even synonymous with compassion fatigue, followed by the definition of STSD (Pfifferling & Gilley, 2000; Baranowsky, 2002; Valent, 2002; Becvar, 2003; Inbar & Ganor, 2003; Salston & Figley, 2003; Costa, 2005; Nene N, 2005, unpubl. data; Mendenhall, 2006; Benoit et al ., 2007), which differs significantly from compassion fatigue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that only dictionary definitions were included in the concept analysis process, while all the other literature sources were used only to confirm the findings of the study, might be seen as a limitation of the study. The rationale for this was that compassion fatigue was most frequently defined by using the definitions of secondary traumatic stress (Sexton, 1999; Baird & Jenkins, 2003; Huggard, 2003; Coetzer, 2004; Maytum et al ., 2004; Kraus, 2005; Abendroth & Flannery, 2006; Adams et al ., 2006; Conrad & Kellar‐Guenther, 2006; Sabo, 2006; Van den Berg et al ., 2006; White, 2006), which is not even synonymous with compassion fatigue, followed by the definition of STSD (Pfifferling & Gilley, 2000; Baranowsky, 2002; Valent, 2002; Becvar, 2003; Inbar & Ganor, 2003; Salston & Figley, 2003; Costa, 2005; Nene N, 2005, unpubl. data; Mendenhall, 2006; Benoit et al ., 2007), which differs significantly from compassion fatigue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%