Media Policy in the United Kingdom: Trust and Distrust in a Converging Media Environment

Smith, Rachael Craufurd; Stolte, Yolande

doi:10.1057/9781137035288_15

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The UK media landscape is considered pluralistic and with a high level of commercialisation, with both public and private TV broadcasters, a range of national and local print newspapers (Binderkrantz et al 2017;Craufurd Smith and Stolte 2012). According to the Reuters International report, adults rely increasingly on online media for news consumption, while the use of television as source of news has declined from 75% in 2019 to 55% in 2020 although the Reuters report notes a subsequent rise in consumption of TV news in following months due to the Covid-19 pandemic (Reuters 2020;Ofcom 2020a).…”

Section: The Media Landscapementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In terms of ownership, sources used by either profile were in their vast majority private (Figure 3). One reason for the extremely high percentage of sources coded as private is the predominantly private and commercial character of media in the two national contexts of most sources used by the two profiles, the UK and the US (Binderkrantz et al 2017;Craufurd Smith and Stolte 2012). In the UK, for example, only two broadcasters, the BBC and Channel4 can be characterised as public, while most print and online media are privately owned.…”

Section: Findings: Classification Of Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Information Sources Shared on Facebook and Networking by Nigel Farage and the UKIP Party in the UK

Karamanidou¹,

Şahin²

2021

SPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article explores how UKIP and Nigel Farage used social media to amplify their message. Mainly digital sources, such as websites and social media, were the preferred source type of both profiles, but more for UKIP than for N. Farage. The most shared digital content of both profiles was websites and social media accounts of their political parties. The second most used source type was print media -mainly national newspapers. Radio stations were the least used source by UKIP, while TV channels the least used source by N. Farage. The higher use of radio sources concerns links to LBC Radio, where he presented a show between 2019 and 2020. TV channels and radio were largely ignored by both profiles as sources. In terms of ownership, sources used by either profile were in their vast majority private due to prevailing type of ownership in the UK. Both profiles relied more on quality newspapers and magazines rather than tabloids but this was often accompanied by a critical approach to the content of such sources. The analysis found that Farage's profile has only four reciprocal connections. In contrast, UKIP had a much larger reciprocal network of 25 different pages. While in terms of reciprocity the two profiles maintained different networks, the analysis of centrality showed a significant number of 63 pages shared the profiles of both UKIP and Nigel Farage. Although the profile of N. Farage had a much smaller reciprocal network and the number of shares of the two profiles by the central groups disseminating their messages was roughly equal, yet, the Brexit Party and N. Farage were the more successful political actors in the period of interest to this study -in the 2019 European Parliamentary elections.

show abstract

Section: The Media Landscapementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Findings: Classification Of Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%