2022
DOI: 10.1177/02673231221112199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Media policymaking and multistakeholder involvement: Matching audience, stakeholder and government expectations for public service media in Flanders

Abstract: This contribution analyzes government, opposition, public service media, media stakeholders and audience views regarding the role and remit of public service media in the run-up to and their impact on the renewal of the 2021–2025 management contract between public broadcaster VRT and the Flemish Government. Results show that, despite a shifting media ecosystem and academics and government pushing for fundamental reform, audiences and most stakeholders’ views stick to a centralized, broad and multiplatform publ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some democracies, PSM accountability is adequately embodied by supervisory bodies (at “arm's length” or fully independent), audience councils, and regular surveys (Benson et al 2017) that can provide reliable information on citizens’ perceptions of PSM content, PSM's service to the public interest and democracy. Accountability is also organized in the framework of competition when the market can guarantee diverse and high-quality content, when government intervention should decrease so as not to distort the market, and when the role of PSM should be more transparently defined and monitored (Van den Bulck and Raats 2022). For example, when investigating the accountability communication of PSM organizations in five European countries (BBC, RTE, ARD, France TV, and RTVE), it became clear that these organizations are interested in the transparency of their activities, but not all show good availability and updating of information about themselves (Lopez-Golan et al 2018).…”
Section: The Role Of Society In Psm Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some democracies, PSM accountability is adequately embodied by supervisory bodies (at “arm's length” or fully independent), audience councils, and regular surveys (Benson et al 2017) that can provide reliable information on citizens’ perceptions of PSM content, PSM's service to the public interest and democracy. Accountability is also organized in the framework of competition when the market can guarantee diverse and high-quality content, when government intervention should decrease so as not to distort the market, and when the role of PSM should be more transparently defined and monitored (Van den Bulck and Raats 2022). For example, when investigating the accountability communication of PSM organizations in five European countries (BBC, RTE, ARD, France TV, and RTVE), it became clear that these organizations are interested in the transparency of their activities, but not all show good availability and updating of information about themselves (Lopez-Golan et al 2018).…”
Section: The Role Of Society In Psm Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%