In this survey we present recent results in the study of the medial axes of sets definable in polynomially bounded o-minimal structures. We take the novel point of view of singularity theory. Indeed, it has been observed only recently that the medial axis -i.e. the set of points with more than one closest point to a given closed set X ⊂ R n (with respect to the Euclidean distance) -reaches some singular points of X bringing along some metric information about them.1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. 32B20, 54F99.We write B(x, r) = B n (x, r) ⊂ R n for the open Euclidean ball centred at x and with radius r > 0 and S(x, r) := ∂B(x, r) for the sphere. When r = d(x, X), we call the sphere or ball supporting. Note that X cannot enter a supporting ball.Remark 2.3. Any point x ∈ B(a, r) where a ∈ X has its distance d(x, X) realized in B(a, 2r). This is a mere student's exercise, but it plays an important role in many proofs.There are two other notions closely related to that of the medial axis. The first is the concept of the central set.The set C X consisting of of the centres of maximal balls for X is called the central set (formally: 'of R n \ X').Remark 2.5. If B(x, r) is a maximal ball, then r = d(x, X).The relation between M X and C X is considered folklore ( 1 ). This result has a practical consequence in that we often work with C X instead of M X (see e.g. the proof of Proposition 3.20). The closure M X is sometimes called cut locus.Theorem 2.6. There is always M X ⊂ C X ⊂ M X .Proof.[5] Theorem 2.25; see also [21] for a different proof.
Both inclusions may be strict:Example 2.7. If X is the parabola y = x 2 , then M X = {0} × (1/2, +∞) whereas the focal point (0, 1/2) belongs to C X .