2005
DOI: 10.1038/nn1399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medial prefrontal cortex determines how stressor controllability affects behavior and dorsal raphe nucleus

Abstract: The degree of behavioral control that an organism has over a stressor is a potent modulator of the stressor's impact; uncontrollable stressors produce numerous outcomes that do not occur if the stressor is controllable. Research on controllability has focused on brainstem nuclei such as the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN). Here we find that the infralimbic and prelimbic regions of the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (mPFCv) in rats detect whether a stressor is under the organism's control. When a stressor is contr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

40
732
1
16

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 843 publications
(789 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
40
732
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…In keeping with this hypothesis, recent neuroimaging observations suggest that the PFC controls amygdala activity when subjects are presented with negatively valenced stimuli (Ochsner et al, 2002;Phelps and LeDoux, 2005). Based on previous suggestions that 5-HT conveys resilience to adversity (Deakin and Graeff, 1991;Deakin, 1991;Richell et al, 2005), we hypothesize that ATD disrupts PFC-mediated control over subcortical brain regions, such as the amygdala and/or the dorsal raphe nucleus (Amat et al, 2005;Heinz et al, 2005;Pezawas et al, 2005). Such a top-down control failure may interact with reductions in 'background' levels of tonic 5-HT to bias the system toward anticipation of adversity (by increasing prediction errors for future punishment).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In keeping with this hypothesis, recent neuroimaging observations suggest that the PFC controls amygdala activity when subjects are presented with negatively valenced stimuli (Ochsner et al, 2002;Phelps and LeDoux, 2005). Based on previous suggestions that 5-HT conveys resilience to adversity (Deakin and Graeff, 1991;Deakin, 1991;Richell et al, 2005), we hypothesize that ATD disrupts PFC-mediated control over subcortical brain regions, such as the amygdala and/or the dorsal raphe nucleus (Amat et al, 2005;Heinz et al, 2005;Pezawas et al, 2005). Such a top-down control failure may interact with reductions in 'background' levels of tonic 5-HT to bias the system toward anticipation of adversity (by increasing prediction errors for future punishment).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The protective bias under baseline, that is the impairment in punishment relative to reward prediction may reflect resilience to aversive signals (Amat et al, 2005;Yehuda et al, 2006; JV Taylor Tavares, L Clark, ML Furey, GB Williams, BJ Sahakian, WC Drevets, unpublished observations). Resilience protects subjects from the detrimental consequences of exposure to adversity and enables them to quickly recover from negative experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next generation sequencing and canonical pathway analysis were applied to conduct a hypothesis-free, transcriptome-level analysis of effects of CSD on gene expression in specific brain regions. The regions selected for study, ventral hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, and central and basolateral nuclei of amygdala, are fundamental to the neurocircuitries underlying the behaviours under study here (Amat et al, 2005;Maren et al, 2013;Moscarello and LeDoux, 2013) as well as the corresponding depression psychopathologies (Capuron et al, 2007;Disner et al, 2011;Mayberg, 2003;Price and Drevets, 2010;Savitz et al, 2013;Sibille et al, 2009;Strigo et al, 2008). 7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, depending on the nature of the stress, e.g., psychogenic or metabolic, different neural pathways and neurotransmitter systems may be invoked (e.g., see Herman et al 2005;Sawchenko et al 2000). For instance, recent reports have emphasized a potential role for changes serotonin (5-HT) activity in the prefrontal cortex specifically after uncontrollable versus controllable stress (Amat et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%