Mediale Migranten 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-92828-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mediale Migranten

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This special collection provides a primer on digital migration studies in Europe. The emergence of the field and focus of digital migration studies is marked by the growing circulation of academic buzzwords, including “connected migrants” (Diminescu, 2008), “e-diasporas” (Diminescu, 2008), “mediatized migrants” (Hepp, Bozdag, & Suna, 2011), “digital diasporas” (Brinkerhoff, 2009; Everett, 2009; Gajjala, 2008), “diasporas in the new media age” (Oiarzabal & Alonso, 2010), migrant “feedback mechanisms” (Bakewell, Engbersen, Fonseca, & Horst, 2016), “digital togetherness” (Marino, 2016), “ICT-based co-presence” (Baldassar, Nedelcu, Merla, & Wilding, 2016), “migrant polymedia” (Madianou & Miller, 2012), “virtual intimacies” (Wilding, 2006), and “transnationalism online” (Sahoo & de Kruijf, 2014) among others. In this section, we seek to chart what the field wants, what the field of digital migration studies wants to see, where it came from and where we feel it is heading.…”
Section: Where Are the Field And Focus Of Digital Migration Studies?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This special collection provides a primer on digital migration studies in Europe. The emergence of the field and focus of digital migration studies is marked by the growing circulation of academic buzzwords, including “connected migrants” (Diminescu, 2008), “e-diasporas” (Diminescu, 2008), “mediatized migrants” (Hepp, Bozdag, & Suna, 2011), “digital diasporas” (Brinkerhoff, 2009; Everett, 2009; Gajjala, 2008), “diasporas in the new media age” (Oiarzabal & Alonso, 2010), migrant “feedback mechanisms” (Bakewell, Engbersen, Fonseca, & Horst, 2016), “digital togetherness” (Marino, 2016), “ICT-based co-presence” (Baldassar, Nedelcu, Merla, & Wilding, 2016), “migrant polymedia” (Madianou & Miller, 2012), “virtual intimacies” (Wilding, 2006), and “transnationalism online” (Sahoo & de Kruijf, 2014) among others. In this section, we seek to chart what the field wants, what the field of digital migration studies wants to see, where it came from and where we feel it is heading.…”
Section: Where Are the Field And Focus Of Digital Migration Studies?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diaspora line of research shows that the media transmit social capital (Peeters & D’Haenens, 2005) and facilitate the integration into a new majority culture (Clement, Baker, Josephson, & Noels, 2005; Soruco & Pinto, 2010). Most importantly, it demonstrates that the uses of host and home media constitute a complex process of acculturation and identity construction (Hepp, Bozdağ, & Suna, 2011). Migrant audiences use the media for both fitting in with the host society by assuming its values (Clement, Baker, Josephson, & Noels, 2005) and reinforcing their own ethnic values and identities at the same time (Alzouma, 2012; Clothier, 2005; Croucher & Cronn-Mills, 2011; Hopkins, 2008; Ogan & D’Haenens, 2012; Oh, 2012; Trebbe 2007).…”
Section: Culture In Media Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Russophone world outside and inside the previous Soviet Union context maintains economic ties, often digitally (Morgunova, 2012). As a result of globalization and technological development, the physical human encounters in communication are shifting more towards mediated encounters (Hepp et al 2011). The communication is no longer limited to a particular physical space or region, which enables diasporic communication and participation and more intense links to the country of origin, but also communication within a country.…”
Section: Shifting the Paradigm: Superdiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%