1989
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198909000-00040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Median Polish for Quality Assurance of a PET Scanner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such behavior is consistent with both short-and long-term sensitivity variations for similar radiation equipment involving PMTs or electronics, such as x-ray transmission computerized tomographs, positron emission tomographs, well counters, dose calibrators, and gamma ray spectroscopy systems (Kearfott et al, 1983(Kearfott et al, , 1984Kearfott, 1989aKearfott, , 1989bKearfott and Rucker, 1989;Dewey and Kearfott, 2008). It is strongly recommended that checks for systematic drift be incorporated into dosimetry programs regardless of whether such drifts are considered to result from the reader or the dosimeters themselves.…”
Section: Driftmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such behavior is consistent with both short-and long-term sensitivity variations for similar radiation equipment involving PMTs or electronics, such as x-ray transmission computerized tomographs, positron emission tomographs, well counters, dose calibrators, and gamma ray spectroscopy systems (Kearfott et al, 1983(Kearfott et al, , 1984Kearfott, 1989aKearfott, , 1989bKearfott and Rucker, 1989;Dewey and Kearfott, 2008). It is strongly recommended that checks for systematic drift be incorporated into dosimetry programs regardless of whether such drifts are considered to result from the reader or the dosimeters themselves.…”
Section: Driftmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…It is strongly recommended that checks for systematic drift be incorporated into dosimetry programs regardless of whether such drifts are considered to result from the reader or the dosimeters themselves. Depending upon the application and the nature of the observed data, more complex methods of monitoring for drift or correction (Kearfott et al, 1983(Kearfott et al, , 1984Kearfott, 1989aKearfott, , 1989bKearfott and Rucker, 1989;Dewey and Kearfott, 2008) may be indicated than those presented here.…”
Section: Driftmentioning
confidence: 99%