2021
DOI: 10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i12/11903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mediating Role of Computer Experience in the Association between MOOC-efficacy and Meaningful Learning

Abstract: This study examines three critical constructs in twenty-first-century e-education-MOOCefficacy, meaningful learning, and computing experience-among undergraduate students at selected public universities in Malaysia. Its primary purpose is to investigate the mediating function of computer experience in the link between MOOC-efficacy and meaningful learning. This study defines MOOC-efficacy based on four aspects (information searching, making queries, MOOC learning, and MOOC usability). Meanwhile, meaningful lea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Ghazali and Nordin, the threshold for factor loadings should be 0.6 or higher. 58 Based on that, reliability for this study was achieved with all the variables tested. Table 3…”
Section: Results and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to Ghazali and Nordin, the threshold for factor loadings should be 0.6 or higher. 58 Based on that, reliability for this study was achieved with all the variables tested. Table 3…”
Section: Results and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, factor analysis makes use of factor loading analysis, being "the proportion of the variance of the variable that is accounted for by the common factors," to group items with the most suitable factors (Ferron et al, 2005, p. 204). This study has adopted a cutoff value for factor loading of 0.63, in keeping with related studies such as Ghazali and Nordin (2019) and Employee workplace well-being Fidell and Tabachnick (2007) that adopt stringent cutoffs: "0.32 (poor), 0.45 (fair), 0.55 (good), 0.63 (very good) or 0.71 (excellent)" (Comrey and Lee, 1992). In this study, few items only had low factor loading.…”
Section: Sample Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, for the purpose of optimizing students' mathematical visual thinking, teachers should first understand which aspects of visual thinking students have underdeveloped aiming to determine steps to improve the instruments and learning instructions employed. Ghazali and Nordin (2019) and Vucaj (2022) both recommend conducting a comprehensive examination of an instrument or model with a focus on obtaining accurate information about the pattern of variables that appear or the interdependence of observed variables. Factor analysis is commonly used in such techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%