2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-017-0350-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mediation of macronutrients and carbon by post-disturbance shelf sea sediment communities

Abstract: Benthic communities play a major role in organic matter remineralisation and the mediation of many aspects of shelf sea biogeochemistry. Few studies have considered how changes in community structure associated with different levels of physical disturbance affect sediment macronutrients and carbon following the cessation of disturbance. Here, we investigate how faunal activity (sediment particle reworking and bioirrigation) in communities that have survived contrasting levels of bottom fishing affect sediment … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complex interactions and feedbacks between organisms and the sedimentary environment have recently been documented through manipulative experiments in both the laboratory (Hale et al, ; Harris et al, ) in the field (Douglas et al, ; Hale et al, ; Kenworthy, Paterson, & Bishop, ; Thrush et al, ) and in modelling studies (Watson, Beaumont, Widdicombe, & Paterson, ). These studies help to disentangle the underlying processes and functions that lead to ES delivery, but the examination of feedback processes or a breakdown of interactions are particularly important (O'Meara et al, ; Yletyinen et al, ).…”
Section: The Importance Of Interactions and Feedbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex interactions and feedbacks between organisms and the sedimentary environment have recently been documented through manipulative experiments in both the laboratory (Hale et al, ; Harris et al, ) in the field (Douglas et al, ; Hale et al, ; Kenworthy, Paterson, & Bishop, ; Thrush et al, ) and in modelling studies (Watson, Beaumont, Widdicombe, & Paterson, ). These studies help to disentangle the underlying processes and functions that lead to ES delivery, but the examination of feedback processes or a breakdown of interactions are particularly important (O'Meara et al, ; Yletyinen et al, ).…”
Section: The Importance Of Interactions and Feedbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of much recent progress in understanding shelf carbon cycling on the NWES (e.g., Stahl et al, 2004;Thomas et al, 2005;Johnson et al, 2013;Hale et al, 2017;Hicks et al, 2017;Carr et al, 2018;Humphreys et al, 2018;Chaichana et al, 2019;Davis et al, 2019;García-Martín et al, 2019), there is still a great deal of uncertainty in both the mechanisms governing carbon dynamics and the magnitudes of contemporary carbon stocks and flows, as well as their responses to future change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dang et al 2010). Measured sediment particle reworking rates using fluorescent sediment profile imaging techniques at the same study sites confirm more intense particle reworking activity in communities that have previously experienced a higher frequency of bottom fishing, substantially extending the maximum depth of sediment reworking (low frequency fishing, 1.99 ± 0.19 cm; high frequency fishing, 4.64 ± 0.5 cm) and increasing the volume of sediment available for nitrification (Hale et al 2017). It is interesting to note that, although some bioturbation groups-such as biodiffusors and upwards/downwards conveyors-were, on average, twice as abundant at sites with a history of low frequency of fishing, the biomass of biodiffusors and surficial modifiers was substantively higher (24 times and 60 times higher, respectively) at sites with a history of high frequency of fishing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%