Medicaid Waiver Adoption for Youth With Complex Behavioral Health Care Needs: An Analysis of State Decision-Making

Abstract

Many states have enacted Home- and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Medicaid waivers, which waive or expand Medicaid means tests to increase access to community-based public mental health services for youth with Serious Emotional Disturbance (SED). This study sought to understand key factors in State Mental Health Authorities and Medicaid Agency decision-making in adopting Medicaid waivers for youth with SED. Using purposive sampling to collect data through semi-structured interviews with officials from 37 state mental health systems, interviews focused on fiscal, historical, and political reasons for states’ adoption or rejection of Medicaid waivers to serve youth with SED. Results suggest that decisions around waiver adoption relate to the size and flexibility of state budgets, the sufficiency of existing public HCBS funding and services, political prioritization of children and families, states’ desire to move away from a reliance on residential care, and ideology related to the role of the state in providing for the welfare of children and families. Advocacy efforts promoting state waiver adoption can address apprehensions about budget constraints and providing financial assistance to non-poor families by emphasizing potential cost savings from residential diversion and ethical imperatives to keep children in their homes and communities.

Did Medicaid expansion close African American-white health care disparities nationwide? A scoping review

“…In the years following the ACA Medicaid eligibility expansion, several initially rejecting states expanded Medicaid eligibility through Section 1115 waivers (e.g., Indiana in 2015, Montana in 2016, and Utah in 2020). These states used these waivers to customize eligibility standards to accommodate better ideological and fiscal reservations [ 54 ]. Some states expanded Medicaid with restrictions—requiring premium payment to begin coverage, using health savings accounts, tying healthy activities to waived premiums (e.g., New Mexico, Texas, Georgia), or including work requirements (e.g., Indiana, Kentucky).…”

The Power of Policy Entrepreneur in Disability- inclusive Policy-Making

“…The policy stream frames the process of making and changing policies so that policies are in line with what is desired (Béland& Howlett, 2016;Blum, 2018;Petridou & Mintrom, 2020;Shephard et al, 2020). Moreover, the political stream is a power that greatly influences policy, since the political arena does influence policy greatly (Graaf & Snowden, 2020;Hsueh, 2020;Mauti et al, 2019;Wals, 2019). In addition, coalitions and a strong network between actors in policy-making or policy change are also needed (Rahardian & Zarkasi, 2021;Suherman, et al, 2021;Weible et al, 2011;Wong, 2016).…”