Medicaid Waivers and Tenancy Supports for Individuals Experiencing Homelessness: Implementation Challenges in Four States

Abstract

Medicaid policymakers have a growing interest in addressing homelessness as a social determinant of health and driver of the potentially avoidable use of expensive medical services. Drawing on extensive document reviews and in‐depth interviews in four early‐adopter states, we examined the implementation of Medicaid's Section 1115 demonstration waivers to test strategies to finance tenancy support services for persons experiencing or at risk of homelessness. Context The Affordable Care Act extended Medicaid eligibility to large numbers of individuals experiencing or at risk of homelessness. This legislative development and the growing recognition of homelessness as a significant social determinant of health have encouraged advocates and policymakers to seek new ways to use Medicaid to provide housing supports. Methods We conducted 28 semistructured interviews with 36 stakeholders in four states. The stakeholders were government administrators, health care providers, nonprofit housing staff, and consultants. We supplemented these interviews with extensive reviews of public documents, media accounts, think‐tank reports, and published literature. We also conducted a systematic inductive qualitative analysis. Findings We identified seven challenges to the successful implementation of tenancy support demonstration projects: resolving the housing supply and NIMBY, removing silos between health care and homeless services providers, enrolling and retaining the target populations in Medicaid, contracting with and paying tenancy support providers, recruiting and retaining key workers, ensuring Medicaid's waiver durability, and reducing administrative crowd‐out and waiver burden. Conclusions Notwithstanding these challenges, three of the four states have made significant progress in launching their initiatives. At this point, the fourth state has delayed its start‐up to consider alternatives to a Medicaid demonstration waiver to provide tenancy supports. The experience of the four states suggests lessons for Medicaid officials in other jurisdictions that are interested in pursuing tenancy support initiatives. Nevertheless, the limitations of tenancy support waiver programs suggest that federal policymakers should consider allowing states to more directly subsidize housing costs for those experiencing or at risk of homelessness as an optional Medicaid benefit.

Towards the Quadruple Aim in permanent supportive housing: A mixed methods study of workplace mental health among service providers

“…Scaling up the use of high support models tied to PSH programs, such as Assertive Community Treatment and other specialised models for individuals with problematic substance use (e.g. van Draanen et al, 2013) as well as exploring policy options for achieving greater integration between healthcare and housing (Thompson et al, 2021) are also recommended. health was evident.…”

Recent Trends Among the Unsheltered in Three Los Angeles Neighborhoods: An Interim Report on the Los Angeles Longitudinal Enumeration and Demographic Survey (LA LEADS) Project

“…connect eligible individuals to housing may be a significant problem, as reflected by over 40 percent of respondents who mentioned never having been contacted for move-in as a reason they were not housed in the past. This pattern may reflect the need for increasing continuity among case workers (Thompson et al, 2021;Tobias, 2022) and reducing the often extraordinary delays in connecting eligible individuals to available housing (Bishari, 2022).…”

“…From a policy perspective, perhaps the most important finding is that the most common factor preventing move-in to housing in the past was never being contacted for move-in (43 percent). This finding is confluent with a recent focus on the importance of service worker staffing levels and continuity in successfully addressing unsheltered homelessness (Thompson et al, 2021;Tobias, 2022). It may also bear on the ongoing controversy over periodic sanitation "sweeps" of encampment-heavy areas that activists claim lead to unsheltered residents being dispersed from these areas, therefore making outreach service follow-up challenging (Chou, 2020).…”

Recent Trends Among the Unsheltered in Three Los Angeles Neighborhoods: An Annual Report from the Los Angeles Longitudinal Enumeration and Demographic Survey (LA LEADS) Project

“…• The number one reason that respondents cited for having not been housed was that they were never contacted for move-in. This finding suggests that decreasing displacement, increasing case worker continuity (Thompson et al, 2021;Tobias, 2022), and reducing the delays between identification of need and housing receipt may yield large dividends in housing those most in need.…”