1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1995.tb00909.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical aspects of ageing in a population with intellectual disability: I. Visual impairment

Abstract: Visual function of an institutionalized population with intellectual disability, consisting of 70 subjects with a mean age of 70.1 (range 60-92) years at initial evaluation, was assessed during a 10-year prospective longitudinal study. One subject had Down's syndrome and could not be assessed as a result of dementia. Lower visual acuity values were relatively overrepresented as compared to reported data from ageing populations without intellectual disability. In addition, the prevalence of moderate to severe v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such conditions include moderate to severe hearing loss and visual impairment [8,9], a high incidence of balance and gait dysfunction [10], arthritis and urinary incontinence [11], obesity [12], and nonischemic heart disorders [13]. Determination of premature aging may be indicated by a range of signs and symptoms [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such conditions include moderate to severe hearing loss and visual impairment [8,9], a high incidence of balance and gait dysfunction [10], arthritis and urinary incontinence [11], obesity [12], and nonischemic heart disorders [13]. Determination of premature aging may be indicated by a range of signs and symptoms [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the prevalence of cataracts, which tends to increase with age in the general population, increases to a greater extent with age for individuals with Down syndrome [Jacobson, 1988]. Prevalence estimates of cataracts among individuals with Down syndrome has been found to range from 5 to 85% compared with 1 to 58% in the general population and 3 to 69% in the overall population of individuals with ID [Cullen and Butler, 1963;Lyle et al, 1972;Jaeger, 1980;NCHS, 1983;Levy, 1984;Shapiro and France, 1985;Jacobson, 1988;Caputo et al, 1989;Aitchison et al, 1990;Catalano, 1990;Cooley and Graham, 1991;Hestnes et al, 1991;Sacks et al, 1991;Pérez-Carpinell et al, 1994;Prasher, 1994;Roizen et al, 1994;Evenhuis, 1995;Berk et al, 1996;da Cunha and Moreira, 1996;McCulloch et al, 1996;van Allen et al, 1999;Merrick and Koslowe, 2001;Warburg, 2001b;Friedman et al, 2002;Congdon et al, 2003;Kerr et al, 2003;Kleinstein et al, 2003;The Eye Diseases, 2004b;van Splunder et al, 2004;Gormezano and Kaminski, 2005;Murphy et al, 2005]. Likewise, the prevalence of keratoconus has been reported to be between 3 and 30% among individuals with Down syndrome compared with Ͻ1% in the general population and 1 to 19% in the overall population of individuals with ID [Cullen and Butler, 1963;Lyle et al, 1972;…”
Section: Vision Problems Among Specific Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, while the percentage of lens anomaly reported for adults without ID has been reported to be as low as 1% [Kleinstein, 1984], Sacks et al [1991] found that 7% of adults with ID working in an activity center in the United States had cataracts. British administrative data suggest prevalence estimates of cataracts as high as 28% among individuals with ID [Kerr et al, 2003], while a study of individuals with ID 60 years of age and older found that 69% had cataracts [Evenhuis, 1995]. Similarly, prevalence estimates of keratoconus are higher among individuals with ID compared to the general population (1 to 19% versus Ͻ 1%, respectively), with the condition reported to be more common among males than females with ID [Levy, 1984;Kennedy et al, 1986;Jacobson, 1988;Hestnes et al, 1991;Maino et al, 1996;McCulloch et al, 1996;Warburg, 2001b;van Splunder et al, 2004].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations