Medical Decision-making During the Guardianship Process for Incapacitated, Hospitalized Adults: A Descriptive Cohort Study

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is sometimes necessary for courts to appoint guardians for adult, incapacitated patients. There are few data describing how medical decisions are made for such patients before and during the guardianship process. OBJECTIVE:To describe the process of medical decision-making for incapacitated, hospitalized adults for whom court-appointed guardians are requested. DESIGN:Retrospective, descriptive cohort study. MEASUREMENTS:Patients were identified from the legal files of a public, urban hospital. Medical and legal records were reviewed for demographic data, code status, diagnoses, code status orders and invasive procedures and person authorizing the order or procedure, dates of incapacitation and appointment of temporary guardian, reason for guardianship, and documentation of communication with a guardian. RESULTS:A total of 79 patients met inclusion criteria; 68.4% were male and 56.2% African-American. The median age was 65 years. Of the 71 patients with medical records available 89% of patients had a temporary guardianship petitioned because of the need for placement only. Seventeen patients had a new DNR order written during hospitalization, eight of which were ordered by physicians without consultation with a surrogate decision maker. Overall, 32 patients underwent a total of 81 documented invasive procedures, 16 of which were authorized by the patient, 15 by family or friend, and 11 by a guardian; consent was not required for 39 of the procedures because of emergency conditions or because a procedure was medically necessary and no surrogate decision maker was available.CONCLUSIONS: Although most of the guardianships were requested for placement purposes, important medical decisions were made while patients were awaiting appointment of a guardian. Hospitalized, incapacitated adults awaiting guardianship may lack a surrogate decision maker when serious decisions must be made about their medical care.KEY WORDS: proxy decision-making; court-appointed guardian; incapacitated patients; health care decisions; surrogate decisionmaking; health care consent.

Timing of Limitations in Life Support in Acute Lung Injury Patients

“…[23] The pattern also may represent two distinct groups of patients: those for whom meetings about prognosis and goals of care occur during the first three days following ALI onset, and those for whom such meetings do not occur until the patient fails to show consistent improvement in organ function. Family meetings may not occur for some subgroups of patients because identifying appropriate patient surrogates and scheduling meetings can be time-consuming and difficult [24, 25]. It is also possible that some intensivists simply choose not to present the option of limiting life support unless patients show several days of steady deterioration.…”

Patient Preferences and Surrogate Decision Making in Neuroscience Intensive Care Units

“…30 The timing of obtaining a court-appointed surrogate can often present a practical challenge to medical teams faced with potentially time-sensitive decisions. 31 Even when an advance care directive exists, most of the time in the NICU setting patient preferences still must be interpreted by a surrogate decision maker and health care team. In some instances, a patient has appointed their own surrogate with either a health care proxy form or a durable healthcare power of attorney document.…”

Ethical Concerns and Procedural Pathways for Patients Who are Incapacitated and Alone: Implications from a Qualitative Study for Advancing Ethical Practice

“…The prevalence of adults who are incapacitated and alone ranges from 3 to 10% of hospital and long-term care populations, affecting adults of all ages, most often older adults (Connor et al 2016; Isaacs and Brody 2010; Teaster 2002). Most clinicians report encountering these patients and participating in the medical decision-making process on behalf of such patients (Bandy et al 2010; Torke et al 2007). In fact, a study of patients in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) found that one in six admitted patients remained incapacitated and without a surrogate during their entire ICU stay, and the median length of stay for these patients was twice as long compared to their counterparts in the medical ICU (White et al 2006).…”