2016
DOI: 10.3402/meo.v21.31760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical educational culture: introducing patients to applicants as part of the medical school interview: feasibility and initial impact show and tell

Abstract: IntroductionThe College of Medicine at our institution underwent a major curricular revision in order to develop a patient-centered context for learning. The admission process was revised to reflect this change, adopting a holistic review process, with the hope of attracting students who were particularly well suited to a patient-centered curriculum and learning culture.MethodsPatients from a single practitioner, who were accustomed to working with medical students, were asked if they would like to select the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,35,36 Further, studies have highlighted that patients' participation in the admission interview process can help identify candidates who exemplify the core components of patient-centred care. 9,37,38 Unfortunately, however, faculties and educators have greatly underutilized patients' involvement in such roles. 6,37,38, Thus, we hope that individuals responsible for curricula development and admissions committees, especially within Canada, will use this study to stimulate, among other things, discussions and ideas on how to initiate and sustain patient involvement in curricula development and admissions committees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,35,36 Further, studies have highlighted that patients' participation in the admission interview process can help identify candidates who exemplify the core components of patient-centred care. 9,37,38 Unfortunately, however, faculties and educators have greatly underutilized patients' involvement in such roles. 6,37,38, Thus, we hope that individuals responsible for curricula development and admissions committees, especially within Canada, will use this study to stimulate, among other things, discussions and ideas on how to initiate and sustain patient involvement in curricula development and admissions committees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personal essays (Katsufrakis et al, 2016), recommendation letters (Ballejos et al, 2018), letters of evaluation (Love et al, 2016), or purpose/personal statements (Ballejos et al, 2018; Witzburg & Sondheimer, 2013) were also utilized to highlight applicant life experiences, overcoming hardship, communication skills, and the student’s ability to successfully complete academic programs. Sims and Lynch (2016) described a unique approach in which applicants met with patients so that faculty could observe interpersonal communication styles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical schools consistently described legal guidelines or rulings regarding holistic review implementation (Grabowski, 2018; Thomas & Dockter, 2019). Numerous sources described concerns regarding problematic bias, reliability, or validity of subjective human decision-making during holistic review processes (Kreiter et al, 2018; Sims & Lynch, 2016; Wilson et al, 2019), and some described the importance of standardizing assessment data to enhance reliability or validity (Love et al, 2016; Marshall et al, 2020). Wilson et al (2019) noted that faculty may experience preferences related to personal or social similarities with applicants and feel legitimized by their expert experiences as objective judges, even when evidence shows some degree of bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,36 In contrast, direct patient engagement in early continuum selection practices may have engendered a negative reaction toward medicine for some applicants. 22,37,39 However, if direct patient interactions in early selection activities kept some people out of the profession who were ill suited to it, this outcome should be deemed beneficial.…”
Section: The Whether Of Patient Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%