1991
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199101103240204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical Malpractice — The Canadian Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This percentage is close to the corresponding values previously reported in China (67%), Japan (60%) and the USA (56%) but substantially higher than the value reported for Canada (33%) 5 , 6 , 32 , 38 . The between-country differences in this proportion probably reflect between-country differences in legal and medical systems and socioeconomic backgrounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This percentage is close to the corresponding values previously reported in China (67%), Japan (60%) and the USA (56%) but substantially higher than the value reported for Canada (33%) 5 , 6 , 32 , 38 . The between-country differences in this proportion probably reflect between-country differences in legal and medical systems and socioeconomic backgrounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The USA spends nearly twice as much per capita on healthcare as Canada and has multiple funding models, while Canada has a universal, publicly funded healthcare system . In addition, AM physicians face more than eight times the number of lawsuits CDN physicians face . These differences may translate into differences in breast cancer surgery care and outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Canada shares the US fault-based malpractice model, tort reforms and other systemic legal differ-ences (such as rare use of contingency fees or punitive damages) result in Canadian physicians being sued approximately one quarter as frequently as their US counterparts and paying much lower premiums. [21][22][23] Comparing physicians' opinions about error disclosure and patient safety across countries could clarify whether these attitudes stem from country-specific issues, such as the malpractice environment. Furthermore, the malpractice environment differs depending on physicians' specialties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%