Elder abuse (EA) is a pervasive problem with serious consequences. Prior population-based EA risk factor research has largely used cross-sectional designs that limit causal inferences, or agency records to identify victims which threatens external validity. Based on a national, prospective, population-based cohort sample of older adults (n = 23,468) over a three-year period from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, the current study sought to estimate the prevalence of EA and identify risk and protective factors. Past-year prevalence of any EA was 10.0%. Older adults with greater vulnerability related to physical, cognitive and mental health, childhood maltreatment, and shared living were at higher EA risk, while social support was protective against EA. Older adults identifying as Black or reporting nancial need were at heightened EA risk. This longitudinal, population-based study advances our understanding of EA risk/protective factors across several domains and informs the development of EA prevention strategies.
Full TextElder abuse (EA) is recognized by policymakers, researchers, and clinicians as a pervasive public health issue affecting an aging population with major health and psychosocial consequences. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently highlighted EA as a public health problem requiring formal surveillance. 1 The 2015 decennial White House Conference on Aging designated EA as one of four top-priority issues affecting older adults, 2 and the World Health Organization highlighted EA as a key issue affecting older adults in its recent World Report on Ageing and Health. 3 EA refers to an intentional act or lack of action by a person in a relationship involving an expectation of trust that causes harm or risk of harm to an older adult; it comprises ve subtypes, including nancial abuse/exploitation, emotional/psychological abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect by others. 4 Recent reviews of population-based EA studies have found pooled one-year prevalence rates between 14% and 16% globally, and between 4% and 8% in Canada, among cognitively intact, community-dwelling older adults. 5,6 EA victimization is associated with serious consequences such as poor physical and mental health, diminished quality of life, and increased rates of emergency services use, hospitalization, and nursing home placement. [7][8][9] Despite the scope and consequences of this problem, our understanding of EA risk and protective factors remains limited, as existing studies have used convenience sampling designs in social service or clinical health settings, [10][11][12][13] Adult Protective Services (APS) case records as a means to identify EA victims, [14][15][16] or crosssectional population-based designs that carry greater external validity but violate the temporal link between proposed risk/protective factors and EA necessary to make causal inferences. 17-21 Risk/protective factor knowledge is necessary to inform the development of targeted, mechanistic EA prevention strategies. Evidenceba...