2013
DOI: 10.4338/aci-2012-10-cr-0047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical Student Appraisal

Abstract: Google(TM) was the preferred search method for questions related to basic disease processes and multimedia resources, but was inadequate for clinical management. Caution should also be exercised when using Google(TM) in front of patients. Medscape(TM) was the most appealing application due to a broad scope of content and educational features relevant to medical trainees. Students should also be cognizant of how mobile technology may be perceived by their evaluators to avoid false impressions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this study, there was a significant difference in the number and types of pDDIs detected by Epocrates® and Medscape® (Tables 4-5). These two databases have been compared head-to-head to evaluate for ease of use and utility in clinical decision-making support, especially for infectious diseases [13-15]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has compared the categories of pDDIs detected by these apps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this study, there was a significant difference in the number and types of pDDIs detected by Epocrates® and Medscape® (Tables 4-5). These two databases have been compared head-to-head to evaluate for ease of use and utility in clinical decision-making support, especially for infectious diseases [13-15]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has compared the categories of pDDIs detected by these apps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bottom-line, previous studies have intensively researched how smartphones and mobile health apps are and can be employed by students, doctors and patients by conducting both empirical research as well as in-depth literature reviews [ 1 , 3 , 6 , 7 , 11 ]. A high focus has been on reviewing the available apps as tools for application areas such as evidence-based medicine or clinical decision support [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviewed apps include apps for literature search, disease diagnosis, drug reference, medical calculators, clinical calculations and various other kinds. Mobile medical apps and smartphones were found to be widely adopted among doctors and patients [ 5 , 6 , 10 ]. In 2012, a study from the United Kingdom reviewed the smartphone and medical related app usage among medical students and junior doctors using an online survey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essas ferramentas permitem ter acesso aos conteúdos de aprendizagem em qualquer lugar e hora. KHALIFIAN, S. et al (2012) avaliou quatro aplicativos móveis, da modalidade de pesquisa, utilizados por estudantes de medicina como recurso ao acesso a materiais de referência, diagnósticos diferenciais e calculadoras médicas para responder questões clínicas diárias. A avaliação foi positiva, permitindo o acesso rápido às informações e eficiência no atendimento.…”
Section: Dispositivos Móveis Contribuindo Na Prática Médica De Profisunclassified