Medical student exam performance and perceptions of a COVID-19 pandemic-appropriate pre-clerkship medical physiology and pathophysiology curriculum

Abstract

Background Medical schools were compelled to abruptly transition pre-clerkship curricula to remote learning formats due to the emergence of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We evaluated student perceptions of remote learning, exam performance, and utilization of third-party learning resources to assess the implementation of a newly developed pandemic-appropriate physiology curriculum. Methods This was an observational study based on a survey conducted in the Spring of 2021 at the University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine (UCISOM). This study aimed to assess first (MS1) and second year (MS2) medical students’ perceptions of satisfaction, support, academic performance, and connectedness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The MS1 class began medical school during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas the MS2 class did so prior to the start of the pandemic. A survey instrument was developed and validated to identify the impact remote learning had on student self-perceptions of the Medical Physiology and Pathophysiology course. Surveys were distributed to all students and responses were collected on a voluntary basis. Exam scores on a customized National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) physiology shelf exam were also compared to objectively identify how the remote curriculum during the pandemic impacted academic performance. Results Of 204 students enrolled, 74 responses were analyzed, with 42 MS1 (40% of MS1s) and 32 MS2 (31% of MS2s) responses. Overall, MS1s and MS2s were satisfied with the curriculum they received (95 and 97% respectively) and the school’s support of their concerns (86 and 100% respectively). Notably, only 50% of MS1s felt connected to their peers, compared to 94% of MS2s. Lecture attendance and self-perception of their academic performance were similar between both classes. Interestingly, the intra-pandemic class’s NBME exam average in 2020 (60.2% ± 8.9, n = 104) was significantly higher than the pre-pandemic class average in 2019 (56.8% ± 11.3, n = 100). Both classes primarily used course materials over third-party learning resources. An additional set of survey questions distributed only to the MS1 class found that the majority of MS1s reported minimal barriers with regards to accessibility, including internet connectivity, study-conducive environments, and balancing family commitments. Overall, pre-clerkship medical students had positive perceptions of the newly developed pandemic-appropriate physiology curriculum. Conclusions Changes to the pre-clerkship physiology curriculum during the COVID-19 pandemic were met with overall satisfaction from the students and an increase in NBME scores. More attention to student connectedness is needed to improve how remote learning can be best optimized into future curricula development.

The Impact of COVID on Microbiology Examination Result with its Further analysis based on Student’s gender and Place of Residence

“…In order to ensure the success of students (who previously have been equipped with virtual education) in exams, then it's better that the institution have to make sure the embodiment long distance learning including its specific virtual constituents into their curriculum, forming a flexible hybrid design that connects the advantages of in-person and remote education [31]. Although this shift to web-based examinations was unavoidably, but all stakeholder (the institution, the governments and so on) must carefully considered other psychic/mental, philosophy of education, and technical characteristics to guarantee the accuracy and also efficiency as part of continuous quality assurance.…”

Collaborative Learning Communities With Medical Students as Teachers

“… 6 – 8 This change may have reduced faculty-student interactions, as students prioritized third-party resources over school-provided lectures. 9 , 10 This paper will discuss the model of near-peer tutoring utilized in medical education, in which a senior student serves as an instructor to a junior student.…”

The Impact of Tele-Education on Family Medicine Clerkship Students’ Learning Outcomes

“…Given the broad potential impact of pandemic curriculum changes, conducting evidence-based assessments to understand the effect on medical education is important. However, much of the relevant literature is international, [4][5][6][7][8] focuses on preclinical education outcomes, [9][10][11][12][13] or examines interpersonal or psychological outcomes instead of educational ones. [14][15][16][17][18] Other studies examine online versus in-person education prior to the pandemic or speculate about the long-term impact.…”