Medical Student Research Activity in Otolaryngology

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate medical student research productivity by institutions associated with otolaryngology residency programs and identify correlates of productivity.Study DesignRetrospective review.SettingN/A.MethodsA systematic search for articles indexed on PubMed published by 116 programs from January 1, 2016 to February 28, 2021 was conducted. Primary outcomes were number of faculty publications, first‐author medical student publications and medical students from each institution. Secondary outcomes included geographic region, number of otolaryngology faculty members, and program rankings.ResultsNationally, the mean number of faculty per institution was 21.7 at the time of search. Over a 5‐year period, there was a mean 98.7 total publications and 15.8 medical student first‐author publications per institution consisting of a mean of 10.03 distinct medical students. One‐way analysis of variance showed no statistically significant difference in medical student productivity (P = .09) or department size (P = .12) between regions. Number of medical student first‐author publications positively correlated to number of faculty (R = .43, P < .05) and number of faculty publications (R = .63, P < .05). The top 30 programs ranked by United States News & World Report or National Institute of Health for funding had a statistically significantly greater mean number of medical student first‐author publications and distinct medical student first authors than all other programs (P < .05).ConclusionGreater numbers of faculty members likely provide more mentorship and opportunities that allow medical students to engage in projects that lead to first‐author publications. These findings allow institutions to reflect on efforts in medical student engagement and provide data to students for career planning.