“…This changing approach to anatomy education delivery is underpinned by a number of multifactorial drivers, including: the availability and logistics of cadaveric resources (McLachlan et al, ; McLachlan and Patten, ), the relevance of anatomy in a modern and expanding medical curriculum (Cottam, ; McKeown et al, ; Turney, ; Louw et al, ), increasing student numbers, decreasing available curriculum time to teach the required anatomy, and pedagogical approaches (Heylings, ; Drake et al, ; Bergman et al, ; Drake et al, ; Freeman et al, ; Chen et al, ). This change in anatomy education approach has been long‐standing and can be tracked back to the introduction of the personal computer (PC) almost 30 years ago (Trelease, ), with great strides being made since, including: two‐dimensional (2D) and three‐dimensional (3D) applications (Evans, ; Lewis et al, ; Pickering, ), eBooks (Mayfield et al, ; Stirling and Birt, ; Pickering, ; Stewart and Choudhury, ), social media (Jaffar, ; Raikos and Waidyasekara, ; Hennessy et al, ; Pickering and Bickerdike, ) lecture webcasts (Vaccani et al, ), 3D printing of replica specimens (McMenamin et al, ; O'Reilly et al, ), discussion fora (Choudhury and Gouldsborough, ; Green et al, ) massive open online courses (MOOCs; Reinders and de Jong, ; Swinnerton et al, ), and virtual and augmented reality (Moro et al, ), all becoming established mediums through which anatomy content can be delivered. This diffusion of innovation into higher education can be observed alongside changing approaches to curriculum design with the increasing use of active learning techniques (Freeman et al, ) and flipped classrooms (Chen et al, ) enabled by such TEL resources.…”