2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical students’ attitudes towards people with intellectual disabilities: A literature review

Abstract: The present paper provides a review of research on medical students' attitudes to people with intellectual disabilities. The attitudes of medical students warrant empirical attention because their future work may determine people with intellectual disabilities' access to healthcare and exposure to health inequalities. An electronic search of Embase, Ovid MEDLINE(R), PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science was completed to identify papers published up to August 2013. Twenty-four studies were identified, most of wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, within psychiatry contact has demonstrated consistent results in counteracting stigmatising attitudes (Corrigan et al ) with even filmed social contact being effective (Clement et al ). Comparably, contact and collaboration with experts‐by‐experience with ID seemed to improve medical student's attitudes as well as health researchers' awareness of the needs of people with ID (Ryan & Scior ; Frankena et al ). Prerequisites for contact being effective in counteracting stigmatising attitudes have frequently been studied: the contact should be positive, non‐hierarchical and in a context focused on cooperation (Pettigrew ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, within psychiatry contact has demonstrated consistent results in counteracting stigmatising attitudes (Corrigan et al ) with even filmed social contact being effective (Clement et al ). Comparably, contact and collaboration with experts‐by‐experience with ID seemed to improve medical student's attitudes as well as health researchers' awareness of the needs of people with ID (Ryan & Scior ; Frankena et al ). Prerequisites for contact being effective in counteracting stigmatising attitudes have frequently been studied: the contact should be positive, non‐hierarchical and in a context focused on cooperation (Pettigrew ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attitudes are influenced by a number of factors -physical, intellectual, social and emotional -and the experiences of the individual or the group. Positive attitudes can lead to decisions such as social and psychological acceptance of the person who has a disability (Tervo, Azuma, Palmer, & Redinius, 2002;Werner, Peretz, & Roth, 2015), improving programmes for people who have a disability -educational (Tindall, MacDonald, Carroll, & Moody, 2015); social (Kam & Wong, 2008;Keith, Bennetto, & Rogge, 2015); medical (Boyle et al, 2010;Ryan & Scior, 2014); and occupational (Tsang, Chan, & Chan, 2004;Uysal, Albayrak, Koçulu, Kan, & Aydin, 2014). By contrast, negative attitudes can lead to decisions such as rejection (Daruwalla & Darcy, 2005;Boer & Munde, 2014;Hassanein, 2015), segregation (Keller & Siegrist, 2010;Keith et al, 2015), and degradation (Panek & Jungers, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge of medical and allied health professions students' attitudes to people with intellectual disabilities deserves empirical attention because in the future, they might be in a position to determine these people's access to health care and exposure to health inequalities. Studies of perceptions of allied health professionals or medical students in other contexts include medical students' preconceived ideas about populations with mental retardation (Handler et al 1994), allied health profession students' perceptions of stroke rehabilitation (Insalaco et al 2007), and medical students' perceptions of effective team work (Byrne and Pettigrew 2010), rural and remote practice (McAuliffe and Barnett 2010), and intellectual disabilities (Ryan and Scior 2014). This list is not exhaustive.…”
Section: The Importance Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%