Medical Students’ Perceptions of Peer Assessment in a Problem-based Learning Curriculum

Abstract

Objectives: Peer assessment (PA) is believed to support learning and help students develop both professionally and personally. The aim of this study was to examine medical students' perceptions of intragroup PA in a problem-based learning (PBL) setting. Methods: This study was carried out between September and November 2014 and involved six random groups of fourth-year undergraduate medical students (n = 60) enrolled at the Arabian Gulf University in Manama, Bahrain. While working on set tasks within a curriculum unit, each student evaluated a randomly selected peer using an English language adapted assessment tool to measure responsibility and respect, information processing, critical analysis, interaction and collaborative skills. At the end of the unit, students' perceptions of PA were identified using a specifically-designed voluntary and anonymous selfadministered questionnaire in English. Results: A total of 55 students participated in the study (response rate: 92%). The majority of students reported that their learning (60%), attendance (67%), respect towards group members (70%) and participation in group discussions (71%) improved as a result of PA. Regarding problem analysis skills, most participants believed that PA improved their ability to analyse problems (65%), identify learning needs (64%), fulfil tasks related to the analysis of learning needs (72%) and share knowledge within their group (74%). Lastly, a large proportion of students reported that this form of assessment helped them develop their communication (71%) and self-assessment skills (73%), as well as collaborative abilities (75%). Conclusion: PA was well accepted by the students in this cohort and led to self-reported improvements in learning, skills, attitudes, engagement and other indicators of personal and professional development. PA was also perceived to have a positive impact on intragroup attitudes.

The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review

“…Papinczak and colleagues found that peer assessment strengthened the sense of responsibility that group members had for each other, in which several students were enthusiastic and committed to providing helpful and valid feedback to support the learning of their peers [33]. In addition, studies by Tayem and colleagues and Zgheib and colleagues reported improvements in communication skills, professionalism, and ability to work on a team [40, 44].…”

Perceptions of the undergraduate medical students about their engagement in curriculum development.

“…Several qualitative studies and reviews from different corners of the world have reported similar concerns that engagement of students in curriculum development is of great importance in the sense that it will increase their interest in studies. 14,15,16,17,18 Our study results also reveals that by engaging the students in curriculum development would increase their interest in studies, the international studies also suggested that in order to enhance learning, engagement of students in the process of curriculum development is must. 19,20 The students become more active and can get good results.…”

Prescription Writing in Small Groups as a Clinical Pharmacology Educational Intervention: Perceptions of Preclerkship Medical Students

“…Moreover, this study reports students’ perceptions. Based on our previous work, we have reasonable evidence to believe that self‐assessment and peer evaluation are valid indicators. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of this intervention in terms of students’ performance in real‐world prescribing needs to be determined.…”