2010
DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-0884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical Thoracoscopy vs CT Scan-Guided Abrams Pleural Needle Biopsy for Diagnosis of Patients With Pleural Effusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
125
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
125
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Metintas et al found no significant differences in the sensitivities of medical thoracoscopy and CT-guided Abrams pleural needle biopsy in subjects with malignant pleural effusion. 6 The diagnostic sensitivities were 94% and 87%, respectively. However, the majority of those studies included subjects with pleural effusion and pleural thickening due to malignant mesothelioma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4 Metintas et al found no significant differences in the sensitivities of medical thoracoscopy and CT-guided Abrams pleural needle biopsy in subjects with malignant pleural effusion. 6 The diagnostic sensitivities were 94% and 87%, respectively. However, the majority of those studies included subjects with pleural effusion and pleural thickening due to malignant mesothelioma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Image-guided pleural biopsy provides the highest diagnostic accuracy. [6][7][8][9] Image-guided pleural biopsy with a Tru-Cut needle provides the highest sensitivity: 70% with ultrasound, 87% with CT. 8,9 Especially in the presence of pleural masses, thickening or nodularity, CPB should be CT or ultrasound guided, and with a Tru-Cut needle. The Abrams needle is indicated in pleural effusion without pleural thickening or nodularity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations