2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01460.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical treatment of craniosynostosis: recombinant Noggin inhibits coronal suture closure in the rat craniosynostosis model

Abstract: Introduction-The mechanisms underlying craniosynostosis remains unknown. However, mutations in FGFR2 are associated with craniosynostotic syndromes. We previously compared gene expression patterns of patent and synostosing coronal sutures in the nude rat and demonstrated down regulation of Noggin in synostosing sutures. Noggin expression is also suppressed by FGF2 and constitutive FGFR2 signaling.(1-2) Thus, we therefore hypothesized that the addition of rhNoggin to prematurely fusing sutures should prevent sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Noggin expression in sutures is downregulated by FGF signaling, these findings suggest a possibility for the therapeutic use of Noggin to treat craniosynostosis caused by hyperactivation of FGF signaling [64]. Indeed, Noggin can suppress suture fusions experimentally induced by transplantation of osteoblasts expressing a mutant form of FGFR2 [65]. Noggin treatment also inhibits recurrence of suture fusion subsequent to suturectomy in a rabbit model of bilateral coronal synostosis [66].…”
Section: Bmp Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Noggin expression in sutures is downregulated by FGF signaling, these findings suggest a possibility for the therapeutic use of Noggin to treat craniosynostosis caused by hyperactivation of FGF signaling [64]. Indeed, Noggin can suppress suture fusions experimentally induced by transplantation of osteoblasts expressing a mutant form of FGFR2 [65]. Noggin treatment also inhibits recurrence of suture fusion subsequent to suturectomy in a rabbit model of bilateral coronal synostosis [66].…”
Section: Bmp Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the authors of this study concluded that overactive FGF/FGFR signaling (as seen in FGFR2 gain-of-function mutations) decreased sutural expression of the BMP antagonist Noggin, leading to increased suture osteogenesis and eventually suture fusion [Warren et al, 2003]. Subsequently, Shen et al [2009] could demonstrate in their chimeric rat model that coronal sutures remained patent when xenotransplantation with mutant FGFR2 osteoblasts was performed together with co-application of recombinant human Noggin. To test the long-term effects of Noggin exposure on suture patency in a murine model, a gel-foam scaffold loaded with Noggin and GFP-expressing cells was placed onto the suturectomy sites.…”
Section: Tgfß/bmp Signalingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although progress has been made to elucidate the events surrounding the cranial suture's fate, predominantly on the molecular and genetic basis, the cause of premature fusion is unknown and much of the suture biology remains poorly understood (David et al, 1982;Kokich, 1986;Slater et al, 2009). In this context, data on bone structure and composition alongside the bony edges of sutures is extremely scarce or contradictory (Enlow, 1982;David et al, 1982;Kokich, 1986;De Pollack et al, 1996;Sherick et al, 2000;Vastardis et al, 2004;Regelsberger et al, 2009). Moreover, it is unknown whether the ossification process in craniosynostosis is pathological itself, or whether it just commences too early.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In suture fusion, type 1 collagen, TGF-beta, FGFR and SPP-1 have been identified to be upregulated in the suture matrix, whereas CBFA1, FGF-2 and IGF-1 become expressed in the adjacent bone borders (Hunenko et al, 2001;Chong et al, 2003;Ignelzi et al, 2003;Eswarakumar et al, 2004;Tholpady et al, 2004;Mooney et al, 2007;Coussens et al, 2008;Moenning et al, 2009;Shen et al, 2009). These processes are most likely occurring in response to external stimuli like the expanding brain (Kokich, 1986;Davis et al, 2009;Oppenheimer et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation