2015
DOI: 10.1118/1.4934823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical use of all high activity sources should be eliminated for security concerns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 , 33 Cesium-137 used in blood irradiators and other medical devices also represents a concern given the ease of dispersibility in its powder form, with many experts calling for the elimination of the use of such high-activity radiation sources due to security concerns. 34 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 , 33 Cesium-137 used in blood irradiators and other medical devices also represents a concern given the ease of dispersibility in its powder form, with many experts calling for the elimination of the use of such high-activity radiation sources due to security concerns. 34 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the nature of RBE M was examined for 125 Numerous studies have demonstrated that plastic scintillators are excellent detectors for use in clinical radiation dosimetry. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Several factors contribute to their suitability. These include: 1) water equivalence, 2) linearity, and 3) fast response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the potential use of radioisotopes in the production of 'dirty bombs' for large scale attacks is a growing fear. 9 By using radioisotopes such as cobalt-60, several additional security layers must be added to the hospital's infrastructure to remain in compliance with regulatory commissions. 10 High energy photons produced by radioisotopes such as cobalt-60 are still used in several specialized machines.…”
Section: Figure 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because they produce radiation, radioisotopes have raised security concerns. The fear is that loss of radioisotopes – due to accident, oversight, or sabotage – could result in their acquisition by unauthorized persons or terrorists who could then produce a radiological dispersal device (“dirty bomb”) 9 . Motivated by these concerns, some members of Congress proposed legislation in the 2015 Appropriations Bill that would have phased out the use of radioisotopes in the United States, including Co-60.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread commercial use of Co-60 means it is often housed in less well-guarded facilities, such as hospitals, that are unlike heavily guarded nuclear facilities 9 . Experience in other countries has demonstrated the potential for mishaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%