2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medication adherence and barriers among low-income, uninsured patients with multiple chronic conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adherence rate found in our study was consistent with the WHO report that states “in developed countries, adherence among patients suffering chronic diseases averages only 50%” [9]. Compared with previous international studies, the adherence rate assessed in this study was similar to the 53% found in Chinese primary-care centers [31], the 48% reported in uninsured American patients who attended community health centers [32], but slightly higher than the 39% observed in Italian outpatient adults [24]. At the national level, our findings are consistent with prior research in Spain performed in chronic patients [33], but significantly different in terms of the adherence rate of 18% reported in tertiary-care settings [23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The adherence rate found in our study was consistent with the WHO report that states “in developed countries, adherence among patients suffering chronic diseases averages only 50%” [9]. Compared with previous international studies, the adherence rate assessed in this study was similar to the 53% found in Chinese primary-care centers [31], the 48% reported in uninsured American patients who attended community health centers [32], but slightly higher than the 39% observed in Italian outpatient adults [24]. At the national level, our findings are consistent with prior research in Spain performed in chronic patients [33], but significantly different in terms of the adherence rate of 18% reported in tertiary-care settings [23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Cost and pharmacological adherence are major obstacles that preclude standard secondary prevention. 29 This study highlights an important disparity and opportunity for intervention in the free clinic setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Chronic condition of the patients included in the study were classified into 7 classes as defined by the ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases, 9 th Revision, Clinical Modification) diagnoses codes with some slight modifications. 26 The interview was taken in English or Bangla, whichever language the participant was more comfortable in. Exclusion criteria included severe cognitive disorders and inability to communicate clearly with the interviewer.…”
Section: Interview Setting and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%