2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mediodorsal but not anterior thalamic nuclei lesions impair acquisition of a conditional discrimination task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first set of experiments assessing learning and decision-making on the varying reward schedules, we found that the integrity of the MDmc is critical to allow monkeys to update their behavior efficiently following a reversal in the identity of the highest value stimulus. Similar deficits have been previously reported in studies using rats with complete MD lesions ( Block et al, 2007 ; Chudasama et al, 2001 ; Parnaudeau et al, 2013 ), an impairment often attributed to failure to prevent perseveration to a previously rewarded option or strategy, though see ( Wolff et al, 2015 ). However, such an explanation cannot account for the patterns of choices observed in the current study, as the monkeys with MDmc lesions were no more likely to persevere with the previously highest rewarded option post reversal than controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first set of experiments assessing learning and decision-making on the varying reward schedules, we found that the integrity of the MDmc is critical to allow monkeys to update their behavior efficiently following a reversal in the identity of the highest value stimulus. Similar deficits have been previously reported in studies using rats with complete MD lesions ( Block et al, 2007 ; Chudasama et al, 2001 ; Parnaudeau et al, 2013 ), an impairment often attributed to failure to prevent perseveration to a previously rewarded option or strategy, though see ( Wolff et al, 2015 ). However, such an explanation cannot account for the patterns of choices observed in the current study, as the monkeys with MDmc lesions were no more likely to persevere with the previously highest rewarded option post reversal than controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The MD is heavily interconnected with the prefrontal cortex, and also receives inputs from the amygdala and ventral striatum ( Aggleton and Mishkin, 1984 ; Goldman-Rakic and Porrino, 1985 ; McFarland and Haber, 2002 ; Ray and Price, 1993 ; Russchen et al, 1987 ; Timbie and Barbas, 2015 ; Xiao et al, 2009 ). Causal evidence from animal models indicates that MD provides a critical contribution in many reward-guided learning and decision-making tasks, particularly those requiring rapid adaptive updating of stimulus values ( Chudasama et al, 2001 ; Corbit et al, 2003 ; Mitchell and Dalrymple-Alford, 2005 ; Mitchell et al, 2007b ; Mitchell and Gaffan, 2008 ; Ostlund and Balleine, 2008 ; Parnaudeau et al, 2013 ; Wolff et al, 2015 ). By contrast, implementation of pre-learned strategies and memory retention remains intact after selective damage to the magnocellular subdivision of MD (MDmc) ( Mitchell et al, 2007a ; Mitchell and Gaffan, 2008 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the functional relevance of these corticothalamic pathways is an important issue as conceptual views posit that they may contribute to cortical functioning by enabling transthalamic communication between cortical areas, thus offering supplemental integrative opportunities ( Sherman and Guillery, 2011 ; Sherman, 2016 ). The functional contribution of thalamocortical pathways appears to be consistent with that of a general role of the thalamus to direct attention toward task’s elements relevant for successful performance ( Wolff et al, 2015a ; Wolff et al, 2015b ), not only in the presence of cues, but also when using the current content of mental representation is required for successful performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Lesions to the MD produce impairments in many of the tasks supposed to tax these processes in instrumental Mitchell et al, 2007;Ostlund & Balleine, 2008;Parnaudeau et al, 2014) and Pavlovian tasks (Ostlund & Balleine, 2008;Pickens, 2008) or even tasks taxing both types of contingencies (Wolff et al, 2015b;Alcaraz et al, 2016). Thus, the impairments resulting from MD lesions often mirror those observed following damage to the corresponding prefrontal area, even though some discrepancies can also be found in the literature.…”
Section: Functional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%