2001
DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2001.117735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medium-dose UVA1 phototherapy in localized scleroderma and its effect in CD34-positive dendritic cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
53
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, phototherapy was used almost exclusively by dermatologists (albeit infrequently), despite extensive literature supporting its use in morphea. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] This implies that at least some patients with morphea are receiving suboptimal therapy. To date, treatment recommendations are based on minimal evidence and largely expert opinion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, phototherapy was used almost exclusively by dermatologists (albeit infrequently), despite extensive literature supporting its use in morphea. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] This implies that at least some patients with morphea are receiving suboptimal therapy. To date, treatment recommendations are based on minimal evidence and largely expert opinion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The signals that initiate or reverse the process are not known. One effective therapy for morphea (ultraviolet A light) may reverse the abnormal cytokine microenvironment that perpetuates the imbalance in CD34 1 and FXIIIa 1 cells in dermis in morphea 27 and in scleroderma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, low-dose (LD) and medium-dose (MD) UVA1 seems to be as effective as high-dose UVA1, with a possible better risk/benefit ratio. [6][7][8][9][10] The optimal dose and treatment protocol regarding therapeutic efficacy still needs to be evaluated. Nevertheless, limitations in these trials exist including small numbers of patients in open, nonrandomized settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%