1989
DOI: 10.1086/168089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medium-energy nuclear data libraries - A case study, neutron- and proton-induced reactions in Fe-56

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In PHITS2.24, a model proposed by Pearlstein [53,54] and modified by Niita et al [3] was employed for calculating nucleon-nucleus reaction cross sections, while models proposed by Shen et al [55] and Tripathi et al [56,57] were alternatively adopted for nucleus-nucleus reaction cross sections. In addition to these models, the Kurotama model was implemented into PHITS2.52 for calculating both nucleon-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus interaction cross sections.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Kurotama Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PHITS2.24, a model proposed by Pearlstein [53,54] and modified by Niita et al [3] was employed for calculating nucleon-nucleus reaction cross sections, while models proposed by Shen et al [55] and Tripathi et al [56,57] were alternatively adopted for nucleus-nucleus reaction cross sections. In addition to these models, the Kurotama model was implemented into PHITS2.52 for calculating both nucleon-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus interaction cross sections.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Kurotama Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11.52. For 56 Fe (p, pn) 55 Fe, use cross sections given by Pearlstein (1989). All of these reactions, except for (p, pn) on 56 Fe, also produce positrons, whose production cross sections were considered in detail by , and use those values.…”
Section: Neutron-producing Reactions and Their Threshold Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, however, the use of this reaction to monitor a proton flux is regarded as incorrect because the (n,α) reaction may also contribute to the yield of 24 Na, thus overestimating the proton flux density Φ. Therefore, the 27 Al(p,x) 22 Na monitor has been preferred recently. The situation can be seen clearly in Fig.…”
Section: Monitor Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we used Letaw's formulae described in [22] to obtain the unified cross section to be 1663 mbarn at 130 MeV and 1873 mbarn at 1500 MeV.…”
Section: Measurement Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%