2012
DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2011.647732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medium-term effects of a monofilament polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function symptoms

Abstract: This report is aimed at describing the effects and complications of a polypropylene mesh in standard gynaecological practice. This is single centre prospective cohort observational study performed at a University affiliated hospital in the UK. It involved the prospective symptom assessment of 41 consecutive patients in 2007 who underwent anterior and/or posterior Avaulta Plus™ or Avaulta™ Biosynthetic Support System (BARD). The validated International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire - Vagina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The improvement in vaginal and sexual matters scores was independent of the anatomical success. It has been shown that mesh implantation improves vaginal and sexual matters similar to native tissue . We have chosen the definition of success as described by Weber et al with the leading point <1 cm above the hymen because there would have been only two patients left in the failure group if we had set it to ≤0 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement in vaginal and sexual matters scores was independent of the anatomical success. It has been shown that mesh implantation improves vaginal and sexual matters similar to native tissue . We have chosen the definition of success as described by Weber et al with the leading point <1 cm above the hymen because there would have been only two patients left in the failure group if we had set it to ≤0 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results suggest that the self-developed POP repair system was non-inferior to the Avaulta system, which has been shown to achieve good outcomes for the treatment of POP. [ 22 , 23 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also has not been determined whether mesh repair increases support to the posterior compartment significantly enough to increase the risk of rectal prolapse compared with repair without mesh. However, we do know that 3 years after posterior vaginal mesh repair, 74 % of patients who had symptoms of obstructive defaecation preoperatively had no such symptoms following surgery [10]. This indicates the significant effect that posterior vaginal defect repair can have on rectal function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical treatment of a rectoenterocoele includes posterior colporrhaphy with or without mesh or an abdominal procedure such as a sacrocolpopexy. Our unit has had success with mesh repair [10], as measured using the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) questionnaire, and hence vaginal mesh was used in the case that we were involved in.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%