2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medium-term Outcomes after Whole-gland High-intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer from a Multicentre Registry Cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…0.58 mm in longitudinal diameter, 1 mm in transverse diameter and 6.4 mm in acoustic axis), is created for each pulse of energy. The risk of fistulae in prostate cancer treated with HIFU is estimated to be 0.13% and is lower than the risk of 1.6–2.8% reported in the surgical management of rectal DIE.…”
Section: Disclosurementioning
confidence: 75%
“…0.58 mm in longitudinal diameter, 1 mm in transverse diameter and 6.4 mm in acoustic axis), is created for each pulse of energy. The risk of fistulae in prostate cancer treated with HIFU is estimated to be 0.13% and is lower than the risk of 1.6–2.8% reported in the surgical management of rectal DIE.…”
Section: Disclosurementioning
confidence: 75%
“…Four studies (4.8%) related to preclinical research (IDEAL phase 0). The 43 remaining original research studies that applied IDEAL were mapped to the corresponding IDEAL stage: IDEAL with nine (20.9%), 27 (62.8%), four (9.3%), 0 (0%), and three (7.0%) publications, respectively .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies were published in European Urology and BJUI . All three Long‐term studies followed the IDEAL framework and were published in European Urology , BMJ and World Journal of Urology .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long‐term data are still not available for evaluation of HIFU therapy . However, in the largest study to date with 569 patients and 5‐year follow‐up, Dickinson et al indicated that HIFU was a reasonable choice for the treatment of nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Heterogeneity in patient selection and insufficient evidence are the major limitations at this time for concluding that focal treatment therapy with HIFU is as effective as more‐traditional invasive therapy, although as more studies emerge, it is clear that focal HIFU therapy in the appropriate circumstances is very promising …”
Section: High‐intensity Focused Us As a Primary Treatment Optionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research into the use of HIFU has been ongoing since the 1990s, and at this time, more than 65,000 patients with prostate cancer have been treated with HIFU in Europe . Compared to the other modalities, HIFU ablation offers advantages over other therapies, especially the lack of substantial injury to tissues outside the treatment zone . A major advantage is that HIFU is completely noninvasive and does not require the insertion of probes into the target tissue .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%