2021
DOI: 10.1002/jor.25017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meeting movement quantity or quality return to sport criteria is associated with reduced second ACL injury rate

Abstract: The purposes of this prospective cohort study were (1) to assess if second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury rate 2 years after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in those who returned to pivoting sport was associated with meeting (a) quantitative return to sport (RTS) criteria, (b) qualitative RTS criteria, and (c) combined quantitative and qualitative RTS criteria, and (2) to determine why athletes did not return to their preinjury (level of) sport. Athletes after ACLR performed RTS tests immediately before RTS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, based on the experiences of the patients in our study, the clinical tests we use to assess whether patients are ready to RTS after an ACL reconstruction, do not necessarily comply with whether patients feel ready to RTS. The difference between passing clinical tests and patients' subjective feelings has recently been highlighted in previous publications, as patients state fear of re-injury as a main component for not returning to sport, [33]. At the same time, RTS criteria seldom comprise the assessment of fear, and may not identify a subset of patients at risk of sustaining an ACL re-rupture [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, based on the experiences of the patients in our study, the clinical tests we use to assess whether patients are ready to RTS after an ACL reconstruction, do not necessarily comply with whether patients feel ready to RTS. The difference between passing clinical tests and patients' subjective feelings has recently been highlighted in previous publications, as patients state fear of re-injury as a main component for not returning to sport, [33]. At the same time, RTS criteria seldom comprise the assessment of fear, and may not identify a subset of patients at risk of sustaining an ACL re-rupture [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, based on the experiences of the patients in our study, the clinical tests we use to assess whether patients are ready to RTS after an ACL reconstruction, do not necessarily comply with whether patients feel ready to RTS. The difference between passing clinical tests and patients' subjective feelings has recently been highlighted in previous publications, as patients state fear of re-injury as a main component for not returning to sport, [30]. Parallelly, RTS criteria seldom comprise the assessment of fear, and may not identify a subset of patients at risk of sustaining an ACL re-rupture [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical therapists gave clearance for RTS according to the definition by Ardern et al 37 : "Returning to the defined sport, but not performing at the desired performance level" regardless of whether this was based on objective criteria or not. 38,39 In order to have a real-life presentation of RTS-decisions in the usual care of physical therapists, the researchers were not involved in the rehabilitation process and RTS decisionmaking. 40 After RTS clearance, RTS athletes were eligible for participation if they met the following criteria: 18-45 years of age and participating at least twice a week in highimpact sports before the injury.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%