Meeting the Needs of All Cultureless Learners: Culture Discourse and Quality Assumptions in Personalized Learning Research

Abstract

This chapter reviews recent qualitative studies on personalized learning in middle/secondary school settings to analyze the role of culture in how this concept is enacted and researched. Personalized learning is posited as a pedagogical approach that aims to revolutionize schooling and challenge educational inequity by foregrounding learners’ agency in what and how they learn, tailoring pedagogy and its purpose to learners’ unique interests, needs, and abilities. Given the strong emphasis of the approach on the uniquenesses of the persons who are learning, our analysis interrogates the discourse on culture in studies on personalized learning and extrapolates how this discourse informs problem formulation, design and logic, sources of evidence, analysis and interpretation, and implications for practice. This review reveals a disconnect between the relevant literature on culture in learning and omissions of researchers and research participants’ cultural positionalities and identities. This appears to affect the quality of educational evidence, inhibiting a deep understanding of the implementation of the personalized learning approach for different communities of learners. We assert that research into practices that intend to meet the needs of diverse learners should center learner and researcher cultures and positionalities as part of a theory of change that permeates the entire research process.

The challenges of implementing cultural-based teaching in remedial education: analyses and recommendations

“…In addition, Rusilowati and Wahyudi [47] demonstrated that teachers encountered difficulties in matching learning skills with inculcated cultural topics. Strekalova-Hughes et al [48] also explicated teachers' significant challenges in planning and implementing lessons related to students' cultures and backgrounds, due to insufficient knowledge and high reliance on the themes introduced in the textbook. Meanwhile, the study findings also assessed the issue of time allocation among teachers, as the classroom learning atmosphere must be related to effective planning and implementation when designing learning activities.…”

Culturally Responsive Personalized Learning: Recommendations for a Working Definition and Framework

“…AutoTutor uses natural language processing to model learners' cognitive and affective states and generate dialogue in a manner that adapts to these states (D'Mello et al, 2011). However, while existing personalized learning systems may consider social or emotional aspects of learning, the lens through which they are developed often assumes that these processes are universal and culture neutral (Roberts‐Mahoney et al, 2016; Strekalova‐Hughes et al, 2021). Past research has suggested that the way in which students purposefully engage with technology‐enabled personalized learning systems may not generalize well across cultural contexts (Rodrigo et al, 2013).…”

Interest-Driven Creator Course in a Blended Setting to Develop Chinese College Students’ Adaptive Learning Skills

“…The adaptive environment (Chatterjee, 2022) facilitates learners to self-regulate their learning and enable them to enhance their affective, psychological, cognitive and social development by learning to master their performance orientation and academic selfhandicap strategies. Their acceptance of the utility of technology should enhance their academic efficacy, personal achievement, goal orientation, academic-related perceptions, beliefs, and strategies (Roschelle & Burke, 2019;Strekalova-Hughes et al, 2021).…”