2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MEG beamforming using Bayesian PCA for adaptive data covariance matrix regularization

Abstract: Beamformers are a commonly used method for doing source localisation from magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. A key ingredient in a beamformer is the estimation of the data covariance matrix. When the noise levels are high, or when there is only a small amount of data available, the data covariance matrix is estimated poorly and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the beam-former output degrades. One solution to this is to use regularization whereby the diagonal of the covariance matrix is amplified by a pre-spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
142
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimates of the data covariance matrix were regularized by removing the weakest PCA components [Woolrich et al, 2011] to leave only 61 (the approximate rank of the data after the use of Maxfilter and removal of two ICA components pertaining to (a) ECG and (b) eye‐movement artefacts). Cue, response and movement termination locked epochs were then inspected across 8‐mm whole‐brain grids to locate subject specific, functionally defined regions of interest (ROIs) corresponding to cortical motor regions: for each subject, the MNI coordinates separately pertaining to either the maximal preparatory ERD, response ERD or PMBR were selected for each hemisphere (locations depicted in Supporting Information Figure S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of the data covariance matrix were regularized by removing the weakest PCA components [Woolrich et al, 2011] to leave only 61 (the approximate rank of the data after the use of Maxfilter and removal of two ICA components pertaining to (a) ECG and (b) eye‐movement artefacts). Cue, response and movement termination locked epochs were then inspected across 8‐mm whole‐brain grids to locate subject specific, functionally defined regions of interest (ROIs) corresponding to cortical motor regions: for each subject, the MNI coordinates separately pertaining to either the maximal preparatory ERD, response ERD or PMBR were selected for each hemisphere (locations depicted in Supporting Information Figure S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize the time course of activation in each ROI, a virtual electrode was created for each ROI coordinate using a linearly constrained minimum variance beamformer ( Woolrich, Hunt, Groves, & Barnes, 2011). The time-frequency representation of the data was then computed at each virtual electrode, between 3 and 30 Hz.…”
Section: Source Space Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ▸ Two distinct cerebral regions can facilitate preferential information exchange by synchronising their rhythmic behaviour; the γ band (40-80 Hz), in particular, facilitates this process, but is also modulated 'top-down' by lower frequencies such as θ (4-7 Hz), reflecting factors, such as arousal states. ▸ α Rhythms (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13), so prominent in the occipital cortex upon eye closure, reflect more than just an 'idling' rhythm but also contribute to active allocation of attentional resources and suppress irrelevant sensory information. 2 ▸ The influential theory 'Communication through Coherence' developed by Fries, 3 builds on existing models of 'binding by synchronisation' that may underpin selective attention, a key function in prioritising neural events to guide awareness and action.…”
Section: The Unique Advantages Of Megmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method, originally developed for use in radar arrays, corresponds to an adaptive spatial filter designed to extract the origins of a signal from some prespecified spatial location. 10 MEG data in either 'sensor space' ( presented as data recorded across the distribution of the sensors) or 'source space' (reconstructed to a 3D model of brain sources) offer a wealth of analysis possibilities and selected features that can relate to a particular clinical question (figure 5).…”
Section: The Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%