2015 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/isspit.2015.7394360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MEG data classification for healthy and epileptic subjects using linear discriminant analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivity represents the ratio of number of times the classifier makes correct positive decisions (i.e., detects spikes) to the total number of positive decisions. Specificity is the ratio of number of times the classifier makes correct negative decisions (i.e., detects spike-free segments) to the total number of negative decisions [ 38 ]. After data processing, eight patients were randomly selected to be used in the GP-based feature generation stage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity represents the ratio of number of times the classifier makes correct positive decisions (i.e., detects spikes) to the total number of positive decisions. Specificity is the ratio of number of times the classifier makes correct negative decisions (i.e., detects spike-free segments) to the total number of negative decisions [ 38 ]. After data processing, eight patients were randomly selected to be used in the GP-based feature generation stage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning will undoubtedly go for better results if there is a sufficient amount of sample data, however at this stage, machine learning can also get good classification results as long as relatively suitable features are extracted. In terms of feature selection, statistical features ( Khalid et al, 2015 ; Alotaiby et al, 2019 ), phase features ( Soriano et al, 2017 ; Matsubara et al, 2018 ; Gautham et al, 2022 ), and graph theoretical features are mainly used for the classification of MEG-based signals ( Wu et al, 2018 ). We can see that a proportion of studies use traditional time-domain signal analysis methods, and over time, more still use frequency-domain and phase-based signal analysis methods or brain signal analysis methods, as these methods better highlight epileptic abnormalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, Kahlid et al first classified epilepsy patients versus healthy subjects using the LDA approach ( Khalid et al, 2015 ). They found that the subjects’ MEG data followed a normal distribution within eight brain regions (right frontal, left frontal, right temporal, left temporal, right parietal, left parietal, right occipital, and left occipital), but with different standard deviations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MEG finds its application in the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges and localizing functional cortices, to guide neurosurgical procedures [ 62 ]. The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier was used for the classification of MEG data obtained from 15 healthy subjects and 18 epilepsy patients [ 63 ]. A two-stage algorithm comprising beamforming by virtual sensors and time-frequency analysis by Stockwell transform was used to detect the high-frequency signals that help in the presurgical planning [ 64 ].…”
Section: Clinical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%