2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21134278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MEG Source Localization via Deep Learning

Abstract: We present a deep learning solution to the problem of localization of magnetoencephalography (MEG) brain signals. The proposed deep model architectures are tuned to single and multiple time point MEG data, and can estimate varying numbers of dipole sources. Results from simulated MEG data on the cortical surface of a real human subject demonstrated improvements against the popular RAP-MUSIC localization algorithm in specific scenarios with varying SNR levels, inter-source correlation values, and number of sour… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The source activity representing an artificial spike was multiplied by the lead-field matrix to generate the forward solution at sensor space. Lastly, Gaussian white noise of SNR = 5, 10, 20 dB ( Liu et al, 2002 , Lin et al, 2006 , Mattout et al, 2006 , Mäkelä et al, 2018 , Pantazis and Adler, 2021 , Sohrabpour et al, 2020 ) was added to the sensor space to simulate the noise-contaminated MEG signals.
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source activity representing an artificial spike was multiplied by the lead-field matrix to generate the forward solution at sensor space. Lastly, Gaussian white noise of SNR = 5, 10, 20 dB ( Liu et al, 2002 , Lin et al, 2006 , Mattout et al, 2006 , Mäkelä et al, 2018 , Pantazis and Adler, 2021 , Sohrabpour et al, 2020 ) was added to the sensor space to simulate the noise-contaminated MEG signals.
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/masoudnickparvar/brain-tumor-mri-dataset). The MRI [85] 2017 LS-SVM and FD EEG [68] 2017 LS-SVM EEG [15] 2017 SVM EEG [95] 2018 RF classifier EEG [52] 2019 Feature based techniques:LR, Linear SVM, FFNN, SCNN, Ra-SCNN MEG [54] 2019 KNN EEG [99] 2019 Gradient Boosting EEG [40] 2022 SVM EEG [1] 2022 KNN EEG [70] 2021 SVM with a radial basis function kernel MEG DL [25] 2019 ANN EEG [35] 2020 ANN EEG [106] 2017 Softmax Classifier EEG [101] 2018 DNN EEG [31] 2021 Hybrid DNN (CNN and LSTM) EEG [92] 2021 CNN-RNN EEG [80] 2021 DeepMEG-MLP MEG [66] D e e p M E G -C N N 2019 EEGNet-8, LF-CNN and VAR-CNN MEG [30] 2021…”
Section: Dataset Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel class of inverse solvers arose in the past decade that utilize the recent advances in machine learning, predominantly artificial neural networks (ANNs) to solve M/EEG inverse problems. These approaches require training an ANN to produce a source estimate based on simulated pairs of source and M/EEG activity and achieve high accuracy compared to many conventional methods (Cui et al, 2019; Hecker, Rupprecht, van Elst, & Kornmeier, 2020, 2022; Pantazis & Adler, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%