“…Based on reviews of the literature about protective factors in forensic risk evaluation (de Ruiter & Nicholls, ; de Vries Robbé, de Vogel, & Stam, ), and from a search of computerized databases for studies involving assessment of protective factors for multiple adverse outcomes, we identified 17 instruments that aim to assist practitioners with the assessment of protective factors for the prediction of a range of adverse outcomes occurring in both institutional/correctional settings and the community following discharge or release: the Short‐Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START; Webster, Martin, Brink, Nicholls, & Desmarais, ), the START: Adolescent Version (START: AV; Viljoen, Cruise, Nicholls, Desmarais, & Webster, ), the Structured Assessment of PROtective Factors (SAPROF; de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, & de Vries Robbé, ), the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY; Borum, ), the Dangerousness UNDerstanding, Recovery and Urgency Manual 3 and 4 (DUNDRUM‐3/4; Kennedy, O'Neill, Flynn, & Gill, ), the Inventory of Offender Risk, Needs, and Strengths (IORNS; Miller, ), the San Diego Regional Resiliency Check‐up (SDRRC; Turner & Fain, ), the Multiplex Empirically Guided Inventory of Ecological Aggregates for Assessing Sexually Abusive Children and Adolescents (MEGA; Miccio‐Fonseca, ), the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS; Posner et al., ), and the Reasons for Living Inventory (RFL; Linehan, Goodstein, Nielsen, & Chiles, ) and its variations: BRFL (Ivanoff, Jang, Smyth, & Linehan, ), RFL‐A (Gutierrez, Osman, Kopper, & Barrios, ), BRFL‐A (Osman et al., ), RFL‐YA (Gutierrez et al., ), RFL‐OA (Edelstein et al., ), and RFL‐CS (Westefeld, Cardin, & Deaton, ).…”