1994
DOI: 10.1016/0160-7383(94)90002-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mega-events and urban policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
36

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
107
0
36
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the massive investment and construction of facilities may have long-term detrimental implications for the host city and surrounding communities (Hall & Hodges, 1996;Prasad, 1999;Roche, 1994;Searle, 2002). This stresses the need to find the means for cross-leveraging mega-events with other smaller-scale events and elements of the host city's product and service mix so that benefits are sustained and an integrated set of resources is used optimally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the massive investment and construction of facilities may have long-term detrimental implications for the host city and surrounding communities (Hall & Hodges, 1996;Prasad, 1999;Roche, 1994;Searle, 2002). This stresses the need to find the means for cross-leveraging mega-events with other smaller-scale events and elements of the host city's product and service mix so that benefits are sustained and an integrated set of resources is used optimally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an extensive body of literatures that demonstrate mega sporting events were short-term, but had long-term consequences with negative aspects to the host city or nation in many cases (Dwyer, Mellor, Mistilis, & Mules, 2000;Preuss & Solberg, 2006;Rascher, 2002;Roche, 1994). Examples of negative externalities of hosting mega sporting events are negative economic impacts, societal and cultural issues, traffic and crowding problems, environmental destruction, unfair relocation of local residents, and others.…”
Section: Positive and Negative Externalities Framing Of Hosting Mega mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses a four-point Likert scale to measure various responses of the questionnaire. For the benefits of local development part, we refer to [62,63]; for recreation experience benefit we refer to [64,65]; for festive identity, we referred to [48,52]; for festival support, we refer to [25,59,66].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%