2014
DOI: 10.3354/meps10677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Megafaunal distribution and biodiversity in a heterogeneous landscape: the iceberg-scoured Rockall Bank, NE Atlantic

Abstract: Species distributions are influenced by spatial structure in environmental factors, but the scales at which these dependencies occur and the effect of habitat patch diversity, connectivity and spatial arrangement have rarely been investigated in deep-sea settings. In this study, spatially limited photographic transects collected from Rockall Bank, NE Atlantic, were combined with sidescan and multibeam sonar maps to model spatial patterns in species distribution and biodiversity. Sediment interpretation maps we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between fjords, stone size heterogeneity only explained a small fraction (3%) of the variability in the biotic data. While it is possible that habitat heterogeneity influences benthic megafauna on a larger spatial scale than was quantified here (approximately 40 m; Robert et al, 2014), it was not possible to quantify habitat heterogeneity on larger spatial scales in this case study. Nevertheless, our results do highlight the importance of considering habitat heterogeneity on different spatial scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Between fjords, stone size heterogeneity only explained a small fraction (3%) of the variability in the biotic data. While it is possible that habitat heterogeneity influences benthic megafauna on a larger spatial scale than was quantified here (approximately 40 m; Robert et al, 2014), it was not possible to quantify habitat heterogeneity on larger spatial scales in this case study. Nevertheless, our results do highlight the importance of considering habitat heterogeneity on different spatial scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The interplay between regional-and local-scale factors is an important determinant of diversity in biotic communities (Ricklefs, 1987), and marine benthic diversity can be influenced by factors at a variety of spatial scales (Gutt and Piepenburg, 2003;Gage, 2004;Robert et al, 2014). In the Arctic, environmental drivers such as depth, benthic food supply, and bottom oxygen affect megabenthic communities at regional scales, but factors such as substratum type and disturbance may be just as important in structuring communities on more local scales (Kuklinski et al, 2006a;Roy et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistically classified faunal assemblages were tested for indicator species as well using the "IndVal.g" function in R (modified after Robert et al, 2014).…”
Section: Statistical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implications of aggregation at such a coarse taxonomic resolution should be kept in mind when interpreting the results presented herein. However, the use of higher taxonomic levels as biodiversity indices is suited to investigating broader-scale patterns (Robert et al 2014) and the wide geographic spread of this analysis is concordant with examining this broad scale.…”
Section: Measuring Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%