2021
DOI: 10.1111/acv.12697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Megafire causes persistent loss of an old‐forest species

Abstract: Climate change and a long legacy of fire suppression are leading to an increased prevalence of ‘mega‐disturbances’ such as drought and wildfire in terrestrial ecosystems. Evidence for the immediate effects of these novel disturbances on wildlife is accumulating, but little information exists on longer term impacts to species and ecosystems. We studied the occurrence dynamics of an iconic old‐forest species, the spotted owl (Strix occidentalis), on a long‐term study area in the Sierra Nevada, CA, USA from 1989 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be driven by variation among species in their exposure to other threats (e.g., the turtles and Blue Mountains water skink are strongly affected by threats unrelated to fire); the time taken for critical resources to recover for some species; and life‐history traits. For example, the greater glider and yellow‐bellied glider ( Petaurus australis ) both depend on large tree hollows, a resource that could be reduced for decades after severe fire (Haslem et al., 2011; Jones et al., 2021; Lindenmayer & Taylor, 2020; Parnaby et al., 2010). Both glider species had the highest estimates for local population loss at 1 week, 1 year and also at 10 years/three generations after fire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be driven by variation among species in their exposure to other threats (e.g., the turtles and Blue Mountains water skink are strongly affected by threats unrelated to fire); the time taken for critical resources to recover for some species; and life‐history traits. For example, the greater glider and yellow‐bellied glider ( Petaurus australis ) both depend on large tree hollows, a resource that could be reduced for decades after severe fire (Haslem et al., 2011; Jones et al., 2021; Lindenmayer & Taylor, 2020; Parnaby et al., 2010). Both glider species had the highest estimates for local population loss at 1 week, 1 year and also at 10 years/three generations after fire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as causing greater immediate impacts on species, these extensive, severe or rapidly spreading fires tend to leave fewer unburnt refuges within the fire footprint (Collins et al., 2021), constraining population recovery by both in‐situ reproduction and recolonization from elsewhere (Banks et al., 2017). Key resources, including habitat structures (e.g., large tree hollows, leaf litter, deep pools, submerged woody habitat) as well as food, can be rare for many years after such fires (Gresswell, 1999; Haslem et al., 2011; Jones et al., 2021). Therefore, megafires can cause large, sudden, and enduring changes in population size for affected species that need to be recognized swiftly by legislative and policy review to ensure that investment, management, and research activities are prioritized to reduce extinction risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, koalas did not persist in such locations where high severity fire dominated in our study (see below). Spotted owls in North America show stronger persistence in areas for up to 6 years post‐fire where there is a high pyrodiversity at fine scales (300–700 m radii; Jones et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annual monitoring of koala occupancy has taken place since 2015 ( https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/forestry/science/forest-ecology/koala-research-in-nsw-forests ). Monitoring is also relevant in relation to devastating wildfires, which are a significant threat to koalas in forests 30 , 37 , as is the case for other threatened species 38 , 39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%