Megaprojects – An Anatomy of Perception

Abstract

For decades, megaprojects have been on the agendas of policymakers worldwide. The positive effects are often illustrated at the national or regional level, whereas the negative impacts are mostly felt at the local level, which is something that most literature on megaprojects neglects. Therefore, the following research focused on local people (residents and communities) to gain a deeper understanding of their perceptions of megaprojects, using the Suramadu Bridge in Indonesia as a case study. The research question was: "What are the perceptions of local people regarding the balance between the negative and the positive effects of megaprojects, and what factors affect their perceptions?" To answer this, both a survey and indepth interviews were carried out. There were two main findings. Firstly, and interestingly, the vast majority of the respondents were supportive of the project, mainly for emotional reasons and because of their cultural background. However, certain groups reported experiencing the negative externalities of the project, which shows how contested megaprojects are in the eyes of local people. Secondly, an exploratory factor analysis revealed that there are three factors underlying people's perceptions, namely immaterial benefits, material benefits and specific employment opportunities. The strongest factor turned out to be, again surprisingly, immaterial benefits, implying that people may perceive a different reality caused by the project, involving intangible aspects such as pride and a new identity. We suggest that including people's perceptions in megaproject studies can contribute to more inclusive megaproject development processes.

Social impacts related to the development of the port of Kribi in Cameroon: The case of settlements relocations

“…Sur le plan technique, les architectes et les ingénieurs en fonction souhaitent y accoler leurs signatures, ce qui peut entraîner des problèmes de faisabilité ou jouer sur les coûts. Finalement, Delphine & al. (2019) soulignent la dimension politique de ceux-ci : les politiciens aspirent à obtenir un surcroît de popularité dans leur pays grâce à la couverture médiatique des grands projets, attitude pouvant les éloigner de l'utilité première des équipements ou infrastructures à construire.…”

Aspern Explained: How the Discursive Institutionalisation of Infrastructure Planning Shaped North-Eastern Vienna’s Urban Transformation

“…Competition between cities and states was the driving force for development, strengthened by the programmatic idea of the European city model combined with the concept of "New Urbanity" for urban expansion (Hatz 2009). Planning's self-conception gradually shifted towards planning as an entrepreneurial task with "valuable" projects of urban development (Novy et al 2001;Delphine, Tejo 2019). As such, Aspern as a new urban quarter in the northeast of Vienna became the flagship project for the city with the alleged possibility to function as a bridge to the new Europe ( Suitner 2015).…”