2014
DOI: 10.4161/cc.28562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meiosis I inXenopusoocytes is not error-prone despite lacking spindle assembly checkpoint

Abstract: The spindle assembly checkpoint, SAC, is a surveillance mechanism to control the onset of anaphase during cell division. SAC prevents anaphase initiation until all chromosome pairs have achieved bipolar attachment and aligned at the metaphase plate of the spindle. In doing so, SAC is thought to be the key mechanism to prevent chromosome nondisjunction in mitosis and meiosis. We have recently demonstrated that Xenopus oocyte meiosis lacks SAC control. This prompted the question of whether Xenopus oocyte meiosis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that MAD2 is not essential for viability in S. cerevisiae , this indicates a much greater requirement for the SAC in the accurate segregation of homologs during meiosis I than in mitosis. In contrast, Xenopus laevis oocytes have been reported to divide without being able to mount a detectable checkpoint delay, and despite this the error rate of chromosome segregation is not worse than in mammalian oocytes, which can induce a SAC delay (Shao et al, 2013 ; Liu et al, 2014 ). In Drosophila oocytes, the SAC components Mps1 and BubR1 are required for correct chromosome segregation in meiosis I (Gilliland et al, 2005 ; Malmanche et al, 2007 ), but according to one study, without detectable influence on APC/C activity (Batiha and Swan, 2012 ), and therefore potentially independently of the SAC.…”
Section: General Introduction Into Meiosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that MAD2 is not essential for viability in S. cerevisiae , this indicates a much greater requirement for the SAC in the accurate segregation of homologs during meiosis I than in mitosis. In contrast, Xenopus laevis oocytes have been reported to divide without being able to mount a detectable checkpoint delay, and despite this the error rate of chromosome segregation is not worse than in mammalian oocytes, which can induce a SAC delay (Shao et al, 2013 ; Liu et al, 2014 ). In Drosophila oocytes, the SAC components Mps1 and BubR1 are required for correct chromosome segregation in meiosis I (Gilliland et al, 2005 ; Malmanche et al, 2007 ), but according to one study, without detectable influence on APC/C activity (Batiha and Swan, 2012 ), and therefore potentially independently of the SAC.…”
Section: General Introduction Into Meiosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that in such large cells the SAC cannot fully inhibit APC activity. Indeed, in Xenopus laevis eggs, which are ∼1 mm in diameter, there does not appear to be any influence of the SAC on meiotic divisions (Shao et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2014). However, SAC activity can be restored by raising the nuclear :cytoplasmic ratio by adding sperm nuclei to cytoplasmic Xenopus egg homogenates (Minshull et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, missegregation rates in mammalian oocytes are high, and therefore, the existence of the checkpoint in female meiosis has been put into question in the past. Indeed, in Xenopus laevis oocytes, the SAC does not exist, and the rate of chromosome missegregations is by far not as high as in mammalian oocytes devoid of checkpoint control (Liu et al 2014). The type of aneuploidy occurring is usually the loss of one chromosome at the first meiotic division.…”
Section: Mouse Oocytes Have a Spindle Checkpoint Too!mentioning
confidence: 97%