2014
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meiotic Gene Evolution: Can You Teach a New Dog New Tricks?

Abstract: Meiosis, the basis of sex, evolved through iterative gene duplications. To understand whether subsequent duplications have further enriched the core meiotic "tool-kit," we investigated the fate of meiotic gene duplicates following whole genome duplication (WGD), a common occurrence in eukaryotes. We show that meiotic genes return to a single copy more rapidly than genome-wide average in angiosperms, one of the lineages in which WGD is most vividly exemplified. The rate at which duplicates are lost decreases th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
92
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
92
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Figure 3, duplicate retention subsequent to WGD follows an L-shaped curve that can be approximated by a power-law function (see Methods), confirming common expectations that gene loss subsequent to WGD is initially fast and then slows down. A similar power-law pattern was recently also observed in a genome-wide analysis of duplicate retention following WGD for a more restricted set of genomes (Lloyd et al, 2014). For ease of interpretation, we grouped the WGD events into three different sets according to the overall time frame during which the WGD event occurred.…”
Section: Homoeologs Are Quickly Lost Following Wgdsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen in Figure 3, duplicate retention subsequent to WGD follows an L-shaped curve that can be approximated by a power-law function (see Methods), confirming common expectations that gene loss subsequent to WGD is initially fast and then slows down. A similar power-law pattern was recently also observed in a genome-wide analysis of duplicate retention following WGD for a more restricted set of genomes (Lloyd et al, 2014). For ease of interpretation, we grouped the WGD events into three different sets according to the overall time frame during which the WGD event occurred.…”
Section: Homoeologs Are Quickly Lost Following Wgdsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The large number of WGD events in this study and their different ages (Figure 1) provide an excellent case to study duplicate retention following WGD (Lloyd et al, 2014).…”
Section: Homoeologs Are Quickly Lost Following Wgdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For promoter and terminator regions, we used available data when it was already defined or we considered 2-kb upstream or downstream after UTR regions. Concerning IWGSC CSS (International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium 2014), we used the Munich Information Center for Protein Sequences (MIPS) annotation as well as new transcript regions identified by RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) mapping (Lloyd et al 2014;see below). TEs associated to IWGSC CSS contigs were identified using RepeatMasker and ClariTE (Daron et al 2014).…”
Section: Sequence Information and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 656,290,406 RNA-seq reads from four meiotic stages (latent/leptotene, zygotene/pachytene, diplotene/diakinesis, and metaphase I) (Lloyd et al 2014; data publicly available at http://wheat-urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Seq-Repository/Expression) with two replicates were mapped on 86,710 CSS contigs from IWGSC (International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium 2014) used as a reference with TopHat2 (version 2.0.13) with zero mismatches (-m 0 -N 0 options). Mapped reads were then filtered using SAMTools and only those mapped with a minimum mapping quality of 30 were kept.…”
Section: Rna-seq Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutation of UVI4 affects the somatic cell cycle but not meiosis [27]. These two genes originated from a whole-genome duplication that is shared by all Brassicaceae [28]. Accordingly, two genes representative of this family are typically found in Brassicaceae species and sequence similarity analysis clearly distinguishes the OSD1 proteins from the UVI4 proteins ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Identification Of Ososd1mentioning
confidence: 99%