“…As such they strained or disrupted the more or less orderly intersection of structures, relations and interactions, based on custom and convention, that sustained chiefly rule. On the other hand, however, by foregrounding questions of individual action and motive, they ensured that the community would forget to query—let alone challenge—the socio‐political status quo (Jones ) . They also gave rise to a panoply of informal, precautionary and compensatory transactions to everyday village life which, even though they had originated as reactions to sorcery, secrecy and distrust, contributed an additional layer of socio‐moral cohesion and functionality to the Mekeo lifeworld.…”