2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10884-013-9307-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mel’nikov Methods and Homoclinic Orbits in Discontinuous Systems

Abstract: We consider a discontinuous system exhibiting a, possibly non-smooth, homoclinic trajectory. We assume that the critical point lies on the discontinuity level. We study the persistence of such a trajectory when the system is subject to a smooth non-autonomous perturbation. We use a Mel'nikov type approach and we introduce conditions which enable us to reformulate the problem in the setting of smooth systems so that we can follow the outline of the classical theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the exponents of the dichotomy determine the rate of convergence to zero of bounded solution either at ∞ (when the dichotomy is in R + ) or at −∞ (when the dichotomy is in R − ). Sometimes it becomes important to determine this rate of convergence, and hence the exponents of the dichotomy, for example when studying chaotic behaviour of discontinuous systems [8] or developing Melnikov theory for implicit nonlinear differential equations [9]. As a matter of fact in [8] the following result has been proved.…”
Section: Theorem 1 (Roughness) Letẋ = A(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the exponents of the dichotomy determine the rate of convergence to zero of bounded solution either at ∞ (when the dichotomy is in R + ) or at −∞ (when the dichotomy is in R − ). Sometimes it becomes important to determine this rate of convergence, and hence the exponents of the dichotomy, for example when studying chaotic behaviour of discontinuous systems [8] or developing Melnikov theory for implicit nonlinear differential equations [9]. As a matter of fact in [8] the following result has been proved.…”
Section: Theorem 1 (Roughness) Letẋ = A(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes it becomes important to determine this rate of convergence, and hence the exponents of the dichotomy, for example when studying chaotic behaviour of discontinuous systems [8] or developing Melnikov theory for implicit nonlinear differential equations [9]. As a matter of fact in [8] the following result has been proved. x has an exponential dichotomy on [T, ∞) (and hence also on R + ) with the same exponents α, β.…”
Section: Theorem 1 (Roughness) Letẋ = A(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, let Y (t) be the fundamental matrix of (A.1), where A lu (t) is replaced by A ls (t). Then, for any τ ∈ R there is a constant K = K(τ ) > 1, and a projection P + such that see again [12,Section 4], and [8,Appendix]. Denote by P + (τ ) := Y (τ )P + Y (τ ) −1 , and by s (τ ) the 1-dimensional range of P + (τ ).…”
Section: A1 On the Lack Of Continuabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the temporal discontinuities, i.e., impulses, addressed in this article are special in that time is a privileged independent variable in the augmented phase space, whose evolution is always given byṫ = 1. Several recent spatially discontinuous studies [37,38,39,41,42] do have connections to this article in that they share the goal of determining conditions on heteroclinic connections, while also being in the spirit of Melnikov theory [43,1,2,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x u ε (p, t) ≈ − sech 2 p tanh p sech 2 p + εM u (p, t) 4 sech 4 p tanh 2 p+[cosh (2p)−2] 2 sech 8 p 2 sech 2 p tanh p [cosh (2p)−2] sech 4 p(38)whereM u (p, t) = I (0,∞) (t)Λ(p − t) for p < 0 , in which Λ(ξ) := 2 sech 2 ξ tanh ξ − sech 2 ξ tanh ξ −x 1 + [cosh (2ξ) − 2] sech 4 ξ sech 2 ξ −xThe pseudo-separatrix formed by the stable pseudo-manifold [green], the unstable pseudo-manifold [red] and the gate [magenta] for the explosion centred at (0.5, 0.8) and ε = 0.02 using (38) at times t = 0.1 [left] and t = 0.6 [right].The restriction p < 0 ensures that this pseudo-manifold is only drawn from the point (0, 0) until it intersects the gate drawn at (0, 1). The stable pseudo-manifold would be given by the expression(38) with the superscript u replaced by s, and where M s (p, t) = −I (−∞,0) (t)Λ(p − t) for p > 0 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%