2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-009-0944-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melanoma gene expression and clinical course

Abstract: Evidence for the in vitro lymphocyte response against autologous melanoma has been accumulating over the past 10 years, leading to the identification of numerous melanoma-associated antigens recognised by T cells. These antigens are targets for specific immunotherapy protocols. However, their expression is heterogeneous during tumour progression and may contribute to therapeutic escape mechanisms and disease progression. This study was designed to chart the importance of these escape mechanisms, and to assess … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Vourc'H-Jourdain et al, MAGE-A3 was significantly related to an increase in disease-free survival when expressed in stage III melanoma patients [23]. …”
Section: Role In Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Vourc'H-Jourdain et al, MAGE-A3 was significantly related to an increase in disease-free survival when expressed in stage III melanoma patients [23]. …”
Section: Role In Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, tyrosinase expression is tightly controlled both spatially and temporally [21]. In tumor tissue, however, tyrosinase expression appears to be constitutively increased [21][22][23]. Furthermore, gray horses at increased risk of tumor formation (ADE Â 2) would be expected to have elevated tyrosinase expression in their melanocytes due to enhanced signaling from the MC1R pathway [18,21,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Desmoplastic melanoma 3/32 (9%)/IHC/E978 [56] Primary tumor 45%/IHC/E978 [35] Metastatic tumor 45%/IHC/E978 50/120 (42%)/qRT-PCR 48/120 (40%)/IHC/E978 [143] Stage I and stage II primary cutaneous melanoma 120/321(37%)/IHC/E978 [73] 12/38 (38%)/TMA (IHC) [114] Metastatic tumor 14/63 (23%)/RT-PCR [145] 10/23 (44%)/RT-PCR [146] 143/202 (71%)/RT-PCR [147] Melanoma Metastatic Humoral response in 12/127 (9.4%)/ELISA [94] Humoral response in 3/44 (7%)/ SEREX [148] 2/9 (2%)/RT-PCR Humoral response in 2/9 (2%)/ ELISA CD8 + T-cell responses/ ELISPOT [149] Humoral response in 17/148 (11%)/ELISA HLA-DP4 in 16/17 (94%) of seropositive patients CD4 + T cells specific for the NY-ESO-1 epitopes were generated from 5 of 6 melanoma patients with NY-ESO-1 Ab [150] Humoral response in 13/31 (42%)/ELISA CD4 + T cell 11/13 (85%) of seropositive patients/ ELISPOT [151] 22/39 (56%)/IHC/E978 [152] Primary tumor 8/61 (13%)/IHC/E978 [54] Metastatic Metastatic 53/55 (96%)/IHC/D8.38 [154] Squamous cell carcinoma 32/109 (29%)/TMA [155] 6/9 (67%)of mRNA positive samples/IHC/ ES121 [114] Humoral response in 4/20 (20%)/SEREX and ELISA [161] 9/23 (39%)/RT-PCR Humoral response in 12/23 (52%) patients and in 5/9 (55%) of NY-ESO-1 expressing tumors/ ELISA [162] 78/92 (85%)/IHC/D8.38 [127] 3/20 (15%)/IHC/D8.38…”
Section: Metastaticmentioning
confidence: 98%