2020
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2020.115045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melia’s R<sub>h</sub> = ct Model Is by No Means Flat

Abstract: With the support of numerous arguments, it has been shown that Melia's claim that his cosmological R h = ct model is flat and infinite is erroneous. In contrast, the model is positively curved, closed and, therefore, finite. With respect to results of Melia's model, it is identical to our Subluminal Model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Independently, Terry Tatum [14] is seriously working on 'Light speed expanding Flat Space Cosmology'. Rainer Burghardt is working on Subluminal expansion model and he argues that, Melia's model represents a closed model against 'flat model' [15]. Our approach is based on Black hole radius and temperature formulae [16] and is free from dark energy and dark matter concepts.…”
Section: Cosmological Disagreements and Quantum Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independently, Terry Tatum [14] is seriously working on 'Light speed expanding Flat Space Cosmology'. Rainer Burghardt is working on Subluminal expansion model and he argues that, Melia's model represents a closed model against 'flat model' [15]. Our approach is based on Black hole radius and temperature formulae [16] and is free from dark energy and dark matter concepts.…”
Section: Cosmological Disagreements and Quantum Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, it is very important to consider R. Burghardt's model [61,62] of 'Subluminal universe' having a positive curvature and light speed expansion. It resembles Melia's model [15,63,64,65] of the universe in all respects and deviates from 'Flat model'.…”
Section: Understanding the True Nature Of Cosmic Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%