2017
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2017.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melt and surface sublimation across a glacier in a dry environment: distributed energy-balance modelling of Juncal Norte Glacier, Chile

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Previous estimates of melt and surface sublimation on glaciers of the subtropical semiarid Andes (29-34°S) have been obtained at few specific locations, but it is not clear how ablation components vary across the entire extent of a glacier in this dry environment. Here, we simulate the distributed energy and mass balance of Juncal Norte Glacier (33°S) during a 2-month summer period. Forcing fields of near-surface air temperature and wind speed are generated using two methods accounting for the main p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although 285 this implies that the model is not strictly mass-conserving, we verify that the discarded snow is in average 34 mm yr -1 over the entire basin (or 688 mm yr -1 = 1.9 mm d -1 over the areas above 5000 m a.s.l. ), which is a reasonable estimate of sublimation amounts for this region (Corripio, 2003;Ayala et al, 2017b), and is in the order of the model uncertainties (see Figure 2). Table 1, whereas values for the sub-surface flux parameters are shown in the supplementary information (Table S1).…”
Section: Model Setup For the Maipo River Basinsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although 285 this implies that the model is not strictly mass-conserving, we verify that the discarded snow is in average 34 mm yr -1 over the entire basin (or 688 mm yr -1 = 1.9 mm d -1 over the areas above 5000 m a.s.l. ), which is a reasonable estimate of sublimation amounts for this region (Corripio, 2003;Ayala et al, 2017b), and is in the order of the model uncertainties (see Figure 2). Table 1, whereas values for the sub-surface flux parameters are shown in the supplementary information (Table S1).…”
Section: Model Setup For the Maipo River Basinsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, the representation of processes driving the mass balance at some specific sites requires more fundamental work, and additional parameterizations or more physicallybased representations are required. Such sites correspond mainly to sublimation-dominated sites above 5500 m a.s.l., where the temperature-index modelling is inaccurate (Ayala et al, 2017a(Ayala et al, , 2017b, debris-covered areas with complex distributions of debris thickness (Burger et al, 2018a), or steep glacierized slopes such as the volcanoes in the Maipo River Basin. 535…”
Section: Uncertainties In the Modelling Of Glacier Changes In Data-scmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative contribution of ice ablation to the total ablation between October 2017 and January 2018 was modeled assuming that there was no difference in the snow coverage between the PLE_Snow ON acquisition (September 2017) and the date of probe measurements of snow depth (October 2017). Spatially interpolated probe depths on the glaciers (section ) were used to initialize a distributed energy balance model based upon Ayala et al () to calculate the total amount ice ablation across the glacier, forced by temporary on‐glacier AWSs and validated against distributed ablation stakes (Figure ). Quantities of ice ablation (converted to a surface height change based upon measured snow density and the assumed 900 kg m 3 density of ice) were added to the PLE_Snow OFF DEM in order reduce snow depths for areas associated with subsequent ice ablation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the profile method and the bulk method have been applied to quantify turbulent fluxes and sublimation (e.g., Ayala et al, ; Conway & Cullen, ; Herrero & Polo, ). Compared to the profile method, the bulk method is more widely used because it is insensitive to observation errors (Munneke et al, ; Yang et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%