2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.08.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melt-electrospinning part I: processing parameters and geometric properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
260
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 369 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
260
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A combination of nano-and sub-microfibres was obtained for the PEU solutions with the lowest (59.5 μS cm -1 ) and the highest conductivity (150.9 μS cm -1 ) while a relatively narrow distribution of nanofibre diameters was found for the PEU solution with a medium conductivity (107.9 μS cm -1 ). The non-uniformity of fibre diameters could have been caused by a broad molecular-weight distribution, whose relation to the fibre distribution was reported in the work of J. Lyons et al, 6 though for a different type of material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A combination of nano-and sub-microfibres was obtained for the PEU solutions with the lowest (59.5 μS cm -1 ) and the highest conductivity (150.9 μS cm -1 ) while a relatively narrow distribution of nanofibre diameters was found for the PEU solution with a medium conductivity (107.9 μS cm -1 ). The non-uniformity of fibre diameters could have been caused by a broad molecular-weight distribution, whose relation to the fibre distribution was reported in the work of J. Lyons et al, 6 though for a different type of material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In the 1980s, Larrondo and St John Manley [13][14][15] first reported the electrospinning of a molten polymer. Lyons et al 16 reported a relationship between molecular weight and fiber size in this system. Zhou et al 17 then obtained polylactic acid nanofibers by melt electrospinning in a guided heating chamber.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The proliferation of hMSCs on the PCL microfibrous scaffold and the SF/PCL nano/microfibrous composite scaffolds was evaluated on Pore size, diameter (µm) 16 PCL 100 Log differential intrusion (mL/g) Figure 3 Pore distributions of the PCL microfibrous scaffold and SF/PCL nano/microfibrous composite scaffolds consisting of varying SF-nanofiber content. Abbreviations: PCL, poly(ε-caprolactone); SF, silk fibroin.…”
Section: In Vitro Cell Proliferationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This intrinsic feature offers them drastically increased surface to volume ratio and high aspect ratio. There are several methods to prepare nanofibers, encompassing top-down (melt-blown (Ellison et al, 2007), melt electrospinning (Dalton et al, 2007, Lyons et al, 2004, islands-in-the-sea (Nakata et al, 2007), and electrospinning (Bhardwaj and Kundu)), and bottom-up (interfacial polymerization (Xing et al, 2008), self-assembly (Viney, 2004), and phase separation (Zhao et al)) approaches. Nanofibers produced from electrospinning have a naturally formed porous structure with excellent pore interconnectivity and the pores are in the range between tens of nanometers to a few micrometers.…”
Section: Nanofibers and Yarnsmentioning
confidence: 99%